We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Inheritance Tax-Property estimations of 3 agents in a simple mail sufficient?
Options
Comments
-
Bigphil1474 said:It would be impossible for HMRC to ascertain the value of the property from the probate information, and to determine whether any CGT was liable.0
-
Bookworm105 said:as shown on the post above, at the end of the day the Valuation Office Agency ("district valuer") is the dept of HMRC whose word is final
by submitting your own value you are asking the VOA to either accept or reject it. If they reject it then the quality of the value you offered comes into play. if done from internet sources it has low value, if done by a qualified valuer it has higher value, byt the VOA could still reject it. If you decide to argue with VOA and thus end up in a tribunal, then you will need to have a professional valuer's report for your case to have any credibility.
If you want to save money then do as you say and see what happens.
The average of 3 should be fine, especially if they have valued with a view to selling rather than for probate purposes, as they will inflate the value to sell rather than deflate for probate.0 -
Hello RAS and everybody wanting to comment. We would be over NIL band - is it than recommendable to better have a valuation? I understood if it would be the case that we sell it for more we would have to adopt IHT valuation and in addition pay CGT after reading more about the theme - but I still wonder: That would mean if eg. if we sell for 230.000 instead 200.000 we would need to pay 40%IHT (plus maybe interest because this comes after more than 6 month after death and increases IHT) and in addition 28% CGT=68% on the additional 30.000 - that would be bad! (Whereas if we sell for 170.000 only we can claim back IHT....). It is a huge risk than not having valuation, right?
0 -
you have lost sight of the big picture, the tax rate is not 100%
if you sell for a higher value then you still get more cash after tax than if you sold for a lower value after tax
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 257.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards