We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Combi v conventional
PoGee
Posts: 784 Forumite
Which of the 2 above would add more value to a 3 bed 3 public room semi? It's conventional at the moment. If it's combi, how much would it cost to rip out the whole old system including all tanks but keeping the immersion tank, new 'good' boiler/ radiators/ all gas and water pipes? The upheaval involved is putting me off a combi. (It would be easier to keep the water copper pipes + tanks and just get new conventional boiler and radiators.) Any advice would be appreciated.
0
Comments
-
Keep the tank.
Neither is more valuable than the other.1 -
If the new owner ever decides to get a heat pump, then they will need the hot water tank.
If it sticks, force it.
If it breaks, well it wasn't working right anyway.1 -
PoGee said:Which of the 2 above would add more value to a 3 bed 3 public room semi? It's conventional at the moment. If it's combi, how much would it cost to rip out the whole old system including all tanks but keeping the immersion tank, new 'good' boiler/ radiators/ all gas and water pipes? The upheaval involved is putting me off a combi. (It would be easier to keep the water copper pipes + tanks and just get new conventional boiler and radiators.) Any advice would be appreciated.I take it you reckon you need a new boiler, then?In which case, the cheapest and most sensible option would be to replace with the same, a 'Heat-Only' boiler. Cheapest to do, and undoubtedly the most reliable over time.I would certainly consider going 'System' boiler, which is essentially the same, but you lose the wee F&E tank in the loft - and that, too, usually adds to long-term reliability.On a different note, you say that if you change to 'combi', you'd still like to keep your 'immersions tank'? Combis and hot cylinders don't go together - combis deliver instant hot water on demand.You also mention 'radiators' and all gas and water pipes? Why? Do they need replacing? You may need - fair chance - a new, larger, gas pipe to supply a combi, but all other pipes should be ok.0
-
Ectophile said:If the new owner ever decides to get a heat pump, then they will need the hot water tank.DHW tanks for heat pumps are quite a bit different to conventional ones (or at least the ones I've looked at). So what ever is fitted now will probably get ripped out if/when a heat pump is installed. There is also a limit on the length of pipework between a HP & cylinder (around 10m max), so the tank may need to be put somewhere else - That is/was one factor that pushed me towards a combi last year.But with recent changes to insulation requirements and the increase of the government grant, I would give a HP serious consideration if I had to replace a boiler now. Worth giving Octopus a shout to see if they cover your area and the sort of cost to expect - They were quoting me about £2700 (subject to survey) which isn't far off the cost of a gas boiler.
Any language construct that forces such insanity in this case should be abandoned without regrets. –
Erik Aronesty, 2014
Treasure the moments that you have. Savour them for as long as you can for they will never come back again.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
