Civil enforcement error

lydecker_777

I understand that, however it just shows that even after their mistake in issuing the pcn, they still pass my details onto DCBL..

KeithP

Why do they continue to insist that your vehicle was parked for over ninety minutes?...

         

lydecker_777

Hi all, 

So I've received a county court claim regarding this,  acknowledgement of service and defence filed .

However my local planning department have finally  gotten back to me after a year with this response :

"Just an email to update you regarding your query at the above site address.

 I can confirm that the ANPR cameras on a technicality required planning permission as that are not fixed to the building and therefore not permitted development. For this reason I have written a letter to the land owner requesting a retrospective planning application be submitted to the Local Planning Authority(LPA). Notwithstanding this, the level of visual harm caused by cameras to the amenity of the surrounding area is minimal, and therefore considered not expedient for the LPA to take any further enforcement action if an application is not forthcoming.

On this basis I will now be closing the case."

So ive replied with the following:

"The main concern I have at the moment is as you've confirmed the cameras are currently not legal in terms of a planning perspective, (until the retrospective planning application is submitted), the company have been using the cameras to fine and prosecute motorists for alleged parking infringements?

I currently have a county court claim in waiting against myself for being in the car park for 12 minutes?

The parking company responsible are in effect committing perjury by lying to a court of law that all their procedures are correct and relevant permissions have been granted when they issue a particulars of claim via the county court .

Would the lack of planning permission until the retrospective application make the ' infringements' invalid ?

Or what steps can ********* council take against the illegal business operation that has been utilising these cameras to fraudulently invoice members of the public over a number of years ?

The revenue generated from the use of these illegally mounted cameras over the number of years they have been operating needs to be examined by a relevant authority to determine if they have been legally obtained.

Could you please advise me if possible on what authority I should report this too?"

So regarding the county court claim , this certainly bolsters my defence if it did get to court ..

Coupon-mad

Only slightly. It's not a defence point.

Use the Template Defence.

Show us the Claim Form, redacted.

lydecker_777

I've deleted my reg

Coupon-mad

Can you show it the right way up and with the password redacted please?

lydecker_777

Coupon-mad said:

Can you show it the right way up and with the password redacted please?

Hi please see attached 

lydecker_777

A photograph of the faded sign taken today 

Castle

lydecker_777 said:

I've deleted my reg

You have left the PCN reference showing.

lydecker_777

Castle said:

lydecker_777 said:

I've deleted my reg

You have left the PCN reference showing.

Amended , thanks for letting me know