Response from Bw legal

Sunflower15

1505grandad said:

Who is the parking company?

The parking space LTD 

Sunflower15

Zbubuman said:

Might be too late now , but worth investigating. You mentioned that the signage changed. Was there anything prominent to advise of this change? Because BPA guidelines do state that they need to inform clearly to regular users of any changes. 

Not that I’m aware of but the actual incident was 2019 so I’d have no way to prove this

Zbubuman

Sunflower15 said:

Zbubuman said:

Might be too late now , but worth investigating. You mentioned that the signage changed. Was there anything prominent to advise of this change? Because BPA guidelines do state that they need to inform clearly to regular users of any changes. 

Not that I’m aware of but the actual incident was 2019 so I’d have no way to prove this

You can still use it. Put the ball back in their court and put them on strict proof that they complied with the BPA guidelines with regards to changes of T&C and tariffs. It will be up them then to provide evidence of prominent signs and warnings highlighting the recent changes. 

Sunflower15

Zbubuman said:

Sunflower15 said:

Zbubuman said:

Might be too late now , but worth investigating. You mentioned that the signage changed. Was there anything prominent to advise of this change? Because BPA guidelines do state that they need to inform clearly to regular users of any changes. 

Not that I’m aware of but the actual incident was 2019 so I’d have no way to prove this

You can still use it. Put the ball back in their court and put them on strict proof that they complied with the BPA guidelines with regards to changes of T&C and tariffs. It will be up them then to provide evidence of prominent signs and warnings highlighting the recent changes. 

Ok great, do I go back to BW legal with this? 

1505grandad

The parking space LTD  -  IPC AoS members

Zbubuman

Sunflower15 said:

Zbubuman said:

Sunflower15 said:

Zbubuman said:

Might be too late now , but worth investigating. You mentioned that the signage changed. Was there anything prominent to advise of this change? Because BPA guidelines do state that they need to inform clearly to regular users of any changes. 

Not that I’m aware of but the actual incident was 2019 so I’d have no way to prove this

You can still use it. Put the ball back in their court and put them on strict proof that they complied with the BPA guidelines with regards to changes of T&C and tariffs. It will be up them then to provide evidence of prominent signs and warnings highlighting the recent changes. 

Ok great, do I go back to BW legal with this? 

No - But keep it on the back burner to use as part of your defense ( if BW legal do pursue a claim)

Sunflower15

Anyone got any ideas what I do now in terms of going back to BW? 

Gr1pr

Reiterate your position, that no money is owed to their client and their client is expected to provide strict proof of any breach of the parking contract on that site, with evidence 

Sunflower15

If this matter proceeds, then our client will be able to provide copies of all the on site signage. 

If you had of read the Tariff board then you would have seen the information clearly displayed. 

The machine on site does accept cash payments for cars, as the signage clearly advises. 

Our client cannot be held responsible for customers not reading the terms and conditions and the tariff board.

You admitted in your appeal to not checking the signs. 

We are also unsure why you keep referring to the BPA as our client is regulated by the IPC. 

If you would like to set an affordable repayment plan, then please make us aware. 

The latest response from them, any advice?

KeithP

Sunflower15 said:

If you had of read the Tariff board...

"had of"... where was that person educated?