PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.

Shared Ownership: Does Decrease in Property Value Result in Lower Rent to HA for Unpurchased Equity

Hello,

I purchased a Shared Ownership (SO) property last year during the bank interest rate fluctuation madness. The lenders valuation was a whole 10% lower than the Housing Association (HA) nominated RICS surveyor valuation. Property prices were volatile and the bank interest rate was climbing up and the affordability window was closing for us, so we bought at the higher price. A full year later, the property price hasn't changed from the lenders valuation last year.

I'm wondering if it would be prudent to pay for a RICS valuation and if the property value is indeed 10% lower than when we purchased, would the HA be compelled to reduce the rent they are charging us? It seems logical since the rent is a percentage of the value of the property they own (unpurchased equity). 

I have read elsewhere on this forum that in a SO situation, if a formal valuation shows an increase in property value, the HA can use this to increase the rent payable on unpurchased equity. By that logic, a decrease in valuation should result in a drop in the rent. 

Has anybody here experienced this or have any thoughts about this please? 

KR, L

Comments

  • eddddy
    eddddy Posts: 17,746 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 29 April 2024 at 12:53PM

    I'm wondering if it would be prudent to pay for a RICS valuation and if the property value is indeed 10% lower than when we purchased, would the HA be compelled to reduce the rent they are charging us? It seems logical since the rent is a percentage of the value of the property they own (unpurchased equity). 


    You need to read your lease to see what it says about rent increases.

    But typically, housing association SO leases say the rent will increase by something like "Consumer Price Index + 1%" each year - so rent increases are not linked to property value.


    But the cost of staircasing is linked to property value. So if the property value has dropped by 10%, the cost of staircasing will also have dropped by 10%.

    (But if you need to remortgage to finance staircasing, you'll have to do some careful recalculations. e.g. If you bought with a 90% LTV mortgage, and prices have dropped by 10%, you'll now be at 100% LTV for your current share.)

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 349.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 452.9K Spending & Discounts
  • 242.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 619.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.3K Life & Family
  • 255.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.