We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
Shed Repair Not Included In Tenancy Agreement

dinkmack
Posts: 37 Forumite

Hi all,
My tenancy agreement says that shed repairs aren't included. I was wondering if it is unlawful because it's a brick shed that was built when the property was.
The reason I'm asking is because the roof is falling in and is dangerous.


My tenancy agreement says that shed repairs aren't included. I was wondering if it is unlawful because it's a brick shed that was built when the property was.
The reason I'm asking is because the roof is falling in and is dangerous.



0
Comments
-
Kindly quote EXACT wording of shed repair exclusion clause.
But assuming it's worded ok and you've signed it, that's the deal you agreed to. AFAIK entirely legal2 -
The shed is not considered a habitable space simply an amenity so they are not prepared to spend money on it. You could have the work done yourself if the shed is useful to you and it would be cheaper than a replacement. If you class it as dangerous they could simply make it safe by demolishing it leaving you with the concrete base. Being reinforced concrete it should stand for quite a few more years.2
-
Single skin concrete outbuilding, even if its attached it won't count as habitable. Doesn't look dangerous to me, but if you think it is stop using the space?
Mr Generous - Landlord for more than 10 years. Generous? - Possibly but sarcastic more likely.2 -
theartfullodger said:Kindly quote EXACT wording of shed repair exclusion clause.
But assuming it's worded ok and you've signed it, that's the deal you agreed to. AFAIK entirely legal
I'm not home at the moment but will as soon as I've got time. Going by what other people are saying it appears they don't have to repair it, which is fair enough I just wanted to make sure 🙂. Thanks.0 -
gwynlas said:The shed is not considered a habitable space simply an amenity so they are not prepared to spend money on it. You could have the work done yourself if the shed is useful to you and it would be cheaper than a replacement. If you class it as dangerous they could simply make it safe by demolishing it leaving you with the concrete base. Being reinforced concrete it should stand for quite a few more years.0
-
Mr.Generous said:Single skin concrete outbuilding, even if its attached it won't count as habitable. Doesn't look dangerous to me, but if you think it is stop using the space?0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 349.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 452.9K Spending & Discounts
- 242.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.3K Life & Family
- 255.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards