We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Taking Ltd Company to court



Comments
-
SteveJW said:Within one week I verbally and also via Whatsapp told the company I was rejecting the vehicle under the the Consumer Rights Act 2015 (CRA 2015)Within 30 days of purchase a letter rejecting the vehicle under the CRA 2015 was sent to the registered address of the company, subsequently a letter before action has been sent.SteveJW said:Can they close the company and transfer the vehicles to a new company, can anything be done to prevent this.0
-
What difference does it make regarding the amount of vehicles they have for sale. You have no idea who owns those vehicles2
-
There was nothing in the sales documentation relating to the return of the vehicle
Section 20 of the Consumer Rights Act 2015 deals with issues around the right to reject, be that the 30 day short-term right to reject or the final right to reject (we will come to this in a latter update).
The law actually says:
“The consumer has a duty to make the goods available for collection by the trader or (if there is an agreement for the consumer to return rejected goods) to return them as agreed.”
It goes on to say:
“Whether or not the consumer has a duty to return the rejected goods, the trader must bear any reasonable costs of returning them, other than any cost incurred by the consumer in returning the goods in person to the place where the consumer took physical possession of them”.
The vehicle is a available for collection, the vendor has failed to make any contact relating to the return or collection of the vehicle
0 -
bluelad1927 said:What difference does it make regarding the amount of vehicles they have for sale. You have no idea who owns those vehiclesIs it not resonable for a Ltd company having 20 vehicles for sale to believe they are owned by the companyIt may be possible that a bank of financial institution may have a financial intrest in the vehicles, but for the amount of vehicles I think maybe notMany of the larger groups have their vehicles on finance, this confuses people when the do an HPI check
0 -
bluelad1927 said:What difference does it make regarding the amount of vehicles they have for sale. You have no idea who owns those vehicles1
-
I am sorry but the likelihood of those vehicles actually being owned by the company are slim. If a company is going to behave in a dodgy way the first thing they do is make sure they own nothing. A friend of mine as part of his business sold used cars. Totally honest which is why he still had people coming back to buy after over 40 years. But some of the cars were not owned by him. Like mine which he sold for me to save me having people coming to my house. He took a pre-arranged fee. If someone is going to be dishonest the vehicles will be in the names of allsorts at an address of a rental house that keeps changing hands.
0 -
Very few car dealers could afford to have that much stock of their own, normally they use dealer financing so they will either be owned by or used as security for a finance co1
-
Presuming the vehicle isn't being used anymore?What's the difference in mileage from purchase to today?0
-
@SteveJW, what date did you reject the vehicle and how had you paid for it? It is possible that there might be an easier way of recovering your money than taking them to court.
What stage are you at with taking them to court? Do you have a hearing date? If not, you will be looking at the end of 2024 or early 2025.
What is the reason behind your interest in their current stock they are advertising for sale? Is your plan to 'seize' one of those vehicles as lien for the money you believe they owe you?
Or is it to win your case, get awarded a CCJ against them and then instruct enforcement officers (bailiffs) to impound one of those vehicles and sell it to pay your costs?
Both options sound highly risky, not least because as stated above, even if the business is still trading at that time their vehicles will almost certainly be part of a vehicle dealer stock funding plan such as Black Horse or Close Brothers (there are lots of similar ones).
Bailiffs have access to their finance records and will not touch any of their stock.
@badmemory says,'If a company is going to behave in a dodgy way the first thing they do is make sure they own nothing.'
To be fair, If a company is going to behave in a tax efficient way the first thing their accountant will advise them is to make sure they own nothing.0 -
powerful_Rogue said:Presuming the vehicle isn't being used anymore?What's the difference in mileage from purchase to today?Not been usedAround 200 milesThanks for the reply0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 349.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453K Spending & Discounts
- 242.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.4K Life & Family
- 255.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards