We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Default date discrepancies

Crystalpalacian1
Posts: 25 Forumite

Hi all
I went on a DMP in Feb 2018 after falling on hard times due to changes to IR35. Long story short, I had 5 credit accounts and 3 of them registered a default in April 2018, 1 in Dec 2018 but a FOS decision made them change it to April 2018.
1 account just didn't register a default at all but rather just late payments. As I'm in the middle of applying for a mortgage, my adviser has asked that I get the late payments marker changed to a default, so I've gone to FOS again. FOS agreed that a default should have been added but suggest from July 2018, this is completely at odds with the 4 other accounts (defaulted April 2018, 1 through FOS itself). I want to apply for the mortgage by June so a default until July isn't ideal.
Shall I tell the FOS investigator I disagree with the date he suggested or should I write to the creditor separately and ask that they register the default earlier than July 2018 as a goodwill gesture? I don't want to undermine the FOS Investigator but he's suggested 5 months as the threshold (3 - 6 months) but the previous FOS Investigator said 3 months was enough.
Any advice would be welcomed. Thanks!
I went on a DMP in Feb 2018 after falling on hard times due to changes to IR35. Long story short, I had 5 credit accounts and 3 of them registered a default in April 2018, 1 in Dec 2018 but a FOS decision made them change it to April 2018.
1 account just didn't register a default at all but rather just late payments. As I'm in the middle of applying for a mortgage, my adviser has asked that I get the late payments marker changed to a default, so I've gone to FOS again. FOS agreed that a default should have been added but suggest from July 2018, this is completely at odds with the 4 other accounts (defaulted April 2018, 1 through FOS itself). I want to apply for the mortgage by June so a default until July isn't ideal.
Shall I tell the FOS investigator I disagree with the date he suggested or should I write to the creditor separately and ask that they register the default earlier than July 2018 as a goodwill gesture? I don't want to undermine the FOS Investigator but he's suggested 5 months as the threshold (3 - 6 months) but the previous FOS Investigator said 3 months was enough.
Any advice would be welcomed. Thanks!
0
Comments
-
The issue is there is no set timeframe to register a default.
FCA guidance states "a default can be registered after between 3/6 missed contractual repayments"
So technically both are correct, but there is nothing stopping you asking the creditor to reconsider the default date and back date if further as a gesture of goodwill.
They are not obliged to do so, it would be at their discretion.I’m a Forum Ambassador and I support the Forum Team on the Debt free wannabe, Credit file and ratings, and Bankruptcy and living with it boards. If you need any help on these boards, do let me know. Please note that Ambassadors are not moderators. Any posts you spot in breach of the Forum Rules should be reported via the report button, or by emailing forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com. All views are my own and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.For free non-judgemental debt advice, contact either Stepchange, National Debtline, or CitizensAdviceBureaux.Link to SOA Calculator- https://www.stoozing.com/soa.php The "provit letter" is here-https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/2607247/letter-when-you-know-nothing-about-about-the-debt-aka-prove-it-letter1 -
Thank you, I was thinking that would be the best option, especially as I settled the debt in full half way through the DMP. Shall I draft the letter and ask the FOS Investigator to send it or shall I just inform him of my intention and do it separately to him?0
-
You need to ask the creditor, the FOS cannot force them to apply what are, legally, just guidelines
Sam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness:
People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.4K Spending & Discounts
- 243.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.7K Life & Family
- 256.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards