PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Any experience with insuring against tenants not paying rent?

Options
Hi all
thanks in advance for any help
As a long term landlord I’m now getting a bit older and need more certainty, especially with the proposed law changes
i was wondering if anyone out there had any experience either good bad or indifferent regarding insurance against rent default?
I realise tenants have to be credit checked etc in order to comply .
just to add I’ve been lucky so far and never had a problem in 30 years! 
The reason I’m asking is that I don’t want one in the next 30 years either…if I live that long 
TIA 

Comments

  • housebuyer143
    housebuyer143 Posts: 4,256 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    We used to issue one at the agents I worked at but it wasn't great. They only paid rent in arrears and there was a month's excess, so your tenant had to be two full months into arrears before you got any pay out at all. If they made a months rent payment then they insurer wanted it back first and foremost. 
    They did start mandatory court proceedings at month 2 though for arrears and this was covered by them. Most landlords though just got caught out by the long wait for the money. 

    Don't forget also that during COVID when the government put a ban on evictions the rent guarantee companies refused to pay out citing unforseen circumstances.

    If you do it, read the small print because as with most insurance, they are out to screw you.
  • lika_86
    lika_86 Posts: 1,786 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Have you considered just building up a pot of money that would cover the time it took you to get them out?
  • motorman99
    motorman99 Posts: 123 Forumite
    Fourth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    Thanks for help
    Ive got pot of money to cover it, just don’t want any aggro.
    my thoughts going forward were either insurance or only rent to someone with a guarantor that stacks up. 
    Anything for a quiet life. 

  • eddddy
    eddddy Posts: 17,973 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 22 March 2024 at 10:10AM

    A landlord told me his experience of using an insurer, and making successful claims. I don't know if all insurers operate in the same way, but his comments included...

    • The insurers want to thoroughly vet tenants before insuring their rent. So if you want to start insuring your current tenants, they'd need to be agree to be vetted and they would have to pass the vetting
    • The insurers specify very precise rules that the landlord must follow. For example...
      • The landlord must send a specifically worded warning letter to the tenant within x days of the first missed rent payment
      • The landlord must issue a (valid) section 8 eviction notice, on the earliest allowable date
    • The landlord told me that many other landlords pay their letting agents to follow all the rules, but he preferred to do it himself


    My impression of the 'insurance company' was that they were essentially an aggressive debt collection company - who offered "Rent Insurance" as a sideline to generate more business.  

    The business model seemed to be essentially this...
    • The landlord pays the 'insurance company' a fee/premium each month for each tenant
    • If the tenant doesn't pay rent to the landlord, the 'insurance company' will pay the landlord
    • Then the 'insurance company' will send in their aggressive debt collectors to persuade the tenant to pay them back their money 

    The 'insurance company' seemed to be able to add 'collection fees' to the amount the tenant had to pay - I guess this must have been a term in the AST that the tenant had to sign.


    On one occasion, a tenant did a runner owing about £1k in rent. Apparently, when the 'insurance company' debt collectors eventually tracked him down - he had to pay about £2.5k in total, because of the added fees. (I don't know if some of the fees resulted from enforcing a CCJ.)

    The extra £1.5k fees went to the 'insurance company' (or maybe some of it was court fees). It didn't go to the landlord.


    I don't know if other rent insurance companies follow this model.

  • user1977
    user1977 Posts: 17,765 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    Thanks for help
    Ive got pot of money to cover it, just don’t want any aggro.
    my thoughts going forward were either insurance or only rent to someone with a guarantor that stacks up. 
    Anything for a quiet life. 

    But it sounds like you've had a quiet life for 30 years! Not sure why you'd want to rock the boat.

    Having an insurer or a guarantor doesn't make all your problems go away, it just changes what happens if a tenant doesn't pay.
  • ReadySteadyPop
    ReadySteadyPop Posts: 1,613 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Photogenic First Anniversary Name Dropper
    Hi all
    thanks in advance for any help
    As a long term landlord I’m now getting a bit older and need more certainty, especially with the proposed law changes
    i was wondering if anyone out there had any experience either good bad or indifferent regarding insurance against rent default?
    I realise tenants have to be credit checked etc in order to comply .
    just to add I’ve been lucky so far and never had a problem in 30 years! 
    The reason I’m asking is that I don’t want one in the next 30 years either…if I live that long 
    TIA 
    What are the proposed law changes?
  • motorman99
    motorman99 Posts: 123 Forumite
    Fourth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    Hi all
    thanks in advance for any help
    As a long term landlord I’m now getting a bit older and need more certainty, especially with the proposed law changes
    i was wondering if anyone out there had any experience either good bad or indifferent regarding insurance against rent default?
    I realise tenants have to be credit checked etc in order to comply .
    just to add I’ve been lucky so far and never had a problem in 30 years! 
    The reason I’m asking is that I don’t want one in the next 30 years either…if I live that long 
    TIA 
    What are the proposed law changes?
    End of section 21
    end of fixed term ast
    i think once labour get in rent controls more likely….and if no section 21 then you can’t rent to someone else for market value 
    I also think with labour that section 8 likely to be more lax towards tenants. 

    Tbh I’m wondering whether to carry on or cash out….could cash out quite nicely and have no worries, but strangely I enjoy being a good landlord and looking after my tenants….despite my comments on possible law changes I’m no Rachman….i do look after them !
  • propertyrental
    propertyrental Posts: 3,391 Forumite
    1,000 Posts First Anniversary Name Dropper
    edited 2 April 2024 at 10:01PM
    latest news I saw said the end of S21 was being watered down.......

    an amendment will be brought forward requiring “the Lord Chancellor to publish an assessment on barriers to possession and the readiness of the courts in advance of abolishing section 21 for existing tenancies”......
    “This watered-down plan means the vast majority of renters still face being evicted from their homes through no fault of their own.






Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.