We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Reduce price?
Comments
-
Give it a rest, houses didn't cost 9x average earnings back then, it's not comparable in the slightest.BungalowBel said:And , being a baby-boomer, I don't think the interest rates are high at all
I remember 15%, and for a short while, 17%. Give me 5% any day!
I'm sure younger people would happily exchange 5% interest rates for houses that can again be bought by a single earner with an average job.Know what you don't4 -
It depends on how desperate you are to sell as to whether it's worth waiting another few weeks. Only you can answer that - you may have to accept a lower priced offer, but what price do you put on flexibility/ability to move/whatever your reason for selling is?
I'm looking as a buyer in SW/SE London right now and a lot of properties have sat on the market for a long time. We're viewing places on the market for 5-6 months with no offers or well under asking price. It's different to the 2016/17 manic market in London where flats sold like hot cakes. So when you are looking at comparably priced properties in the area, you also need to ask how long they have been on the market for - no point a being comparable to other houses if those haven't sold either!
That said, some properties also sell within a few days. Different buyers value different things so if you're not in a rush to sell, there's no harm waiting to see if someone sees that special something in your flat.
0 -
Thanks everyone, really helpful! I won’t post a link to the advert as it’s against the forum rules but I also don’t want to be recognisable. I think we will wait a few more weeks then reduce the price. We are not desperate to move but in the same time I can’t see myself staying there for another year!1
-
OP, we put ours on the market in October and were thinking of reducing the price in early January but decided against it, and then got an acceptable offer, so I'm glad we didn't. Thing is though, if people are viewing it, if they wanted to buy it but thought the price was too high they'd just offer less. My philosophy essentially became so long as we are getting viewings, we'll leave the price as is. If we stop getting viewings, then we'll have to think again.1
-
Thanks, problem is we haven’t had any viewings for two weeks now and I think in total we had maybe 5 in the last two months 😩Bigphil1474 said:OP, we put ours on the market in October and were thinking of reducing the price in early January but decided against it, and then got an acceptable offer, so I'm glad we didn't. Thing is though, if people are viewing it, if they wanted to buy it but thought the price was too high they'd just offer less. My philosophy essentially became so long as we are getting viewings, we'll leave the price as is. If we stop getting viewings, then we'll have to think again.0 -
Yes but think how percentages work. On what total value?BungalowBel said:And , being a baby-boomer, I don't think the interest rates are high at all
I remember 15%, and for a short while, 17%. Give me 5% any day!
Give me 15% anyday on the price of a house back when you're thinking of, rather than 5% of the massively increased prices we have now.
heh @Exodi beat me to it.
I don't earn that much more than people did back then (comparatively, especially taking into account inflation), yet back then I'd have been able to buy a house with CASH, just on my income!
Yet now even with both me & my partner having high salaried jobs, we still need a mega mortgage. You're also losing the benefit of one person being able to be at home providing childcare and homemaker work too.1 -
'Offers around' vs 'offers over' May temp people to make an offer, the market is just very slow.
Also the RM filters are 375-400, So 375 would get it on the first 10 pages rather than over page 10 on the results.
"We got a nasty shock last week when Santander announced a massive 20 per cent cut to one of its top savings rates.The bank, which has more than 14 million customers, said it was acting proactively as it expected the Bank of England’s base rate to fall in the coming months.
A few days after the shock cut announcement, it hiked its mortgage rates. Let’s hope others do not follow and cut their savings rates, especially given that the base rate has yet to fall from its current level of 5.25 per cent."
https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/saving/article-13214967/Did-spot-smoke-mirrors-trick-Santander-pulled-week-SYLVIA-MORRIS-explains.html
0 -
We bought our first house in 1995 for £45k. At the time I was on about £10k a year. My partner also worked . We've just sold that house for £180k, and my salary is £40k. My partner no longer works. The ratios are identical.BobT36 said:
Yes but think how percentages work. On what total value?BungalowBel said:And , being a baby-boomer, I don't think the interest rates are high at all
I remember 15%, and for a short while, 17%. Give me 5% any day!
Give me 15% anyday on the price of a house back when you're thinking of, rather than 5% of the massively increased prices we have now.
heh @Exodi beat me to it.
I don't earn that much more than people did back then (comparatively, especially taking into account inflation), yet back then I'd have been able to buy a house with CASH, just on my income!
Yet now even with both me & my partner having high salaried jobs, we still need a mega mortgage. You're also losing the benefit of one person being able to be at home providing childcare and homemaker work too.1 -
... erm OK? Thanks for the anecdote I guess, though I'm not sure what your point is?Bigphil1474 said:
We bought our first house in 1995 for £45k. At the time I was on about £10k a year. My partner also worked . We've just sold that house for £180k, and my salary is £40k. My partner no longer works. The ratios are identical.BobT36 said:
Yes but think how percentages work. On what total value?BungalowBel said:And , being a baby-boomer, I don't think the interest rates are high at all
I remember 15%, and for a short while, 17%. Give me 5% any day!
Give me 15% anyday on the price of a house back when you're thinking of, rather than 5% of the massively increased prices we have now.
heh @Exodi beat me to it.
I don't earn that much more than people did back then (comparatively, especially taking into account inflation), yet back then I'd have been able to buy a house with CASH, just on my income!
Yet now even with both me & my partner having high salaried jobs, we still need a mega mortgage. You're also losing the benefit of one person being able to be at home providing childcare and homemaker work too.
There's so much data out there about average house prices and average earnings, I can only conclude that you either already know the ratio between average house prices and average earnings has obviously increased (but then I'm not sure of the purpose of your comment) or you truly believe houses are still 4.5x average earnings (which I truly find hard to believe)?
Honestly I really don't know what else to say to you... I can link sources if you want, but I mean they're not hard to find...
EDIT: and you have a high post count so you're clearly active on this forum. What is going on!Know what you don't0 -
There's so much data out there about average house prices and average earnings, I can only conclude that you either already know the ratio between average house prices and average earnings has obviously increased (but then I'm not sure of the purpose of your comment) or you truly believe houses are still 4.5x average earnings (which I truly find hard to believe)?
According to the Nationwide charts ( last one in the link below) , many areas of the UK still hover around that 4.5 figure, some even less.
Nationwide HPI News - Charts (nationwidehousepriceindex.co.uk)
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

