PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.

Selling a house without a solicitor - legalities?

If someone wishes to sell a house to a cash buyer with no mortgage needed, it is possible to transfer ownership via the land registry just by filling in a form (and if so which one, and who needs to sign it) and with no legal representation?
Question is not for me but is around someone who may be being taken advantage of so I'm looking into what safeguards are/are not in place.
Thanks all. 
All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.

Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.
«1

Comments

  • Hoenir
    Hoenir Posts: 6,559 Forumite
    1,000 Posts First Anniversary Name Dropper
    If the buyer has a solicitor they might not be prepared to deal with you directly. 
  • elsien
    elsien Posts: 35,433 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 8 March 2024 at 7:16PM
    Neither party has a solicitor. The concern is that the buyer is the one who is taking advantage  - they have offered cash and said they will sort out the property transfer themselves. There's a lot more to it which I can't go into but a very real possibility that a vulnerable person is giving an asset away to an acquaintance at a fraction of its value. Safeguarding raised but I'm trying to understand if the property can just be handed over with the completion of the correct form?
    All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.

    Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.
  • Tony5896
    Tony5896 Posts: 68 Forumite
    10 Posts First Anniversary
    edited 8 March 2024 at 7:43PM
    Sound like someone is trying to avoid a tax or several .. then you would need to explain to a bank why a large sum of money has just appeared in your account 

    that’s aside from the vulnerable person issue ..


  • OutdoorQueen
    OutdoorQueen Posts: 123 Forumite
    100 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    edited 8 March 2024 at 8:14PM

    Alarm bells are ringing and I would be concerned too.  Anything is possible if the criminals know the right people.  Fraud is often very sophisticated.  

    I’ve heard of people who lost their homes following fraud.  The criminals befriended someone and made them believe the house was too much hassle for them.  They were asked to sign documents to allow people to help them.  Police and other relevant parties were notified.  It was heart breaking.  If it doesn’t feel right, trust your instinct and gut reaction.  

  • user1977
    user1977 Posts: 17,254 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    elsien said:
    Neither party has a solicitor. The concern is that the buyer is the one who is taking advantage  - they have offered cash and said they will sort out the property transfer themselves. There's a lot more to it which I can't go into but a very real possibility that a vulnerable person is giving an asset away to an acquaintance at a fraction of its value. Safeguarding raised but I'm trying to understand if the property can just be handed over with the completion of the correct form?
    In short, yes.

    If one party had a solicitor then the solicitor would at least be professionally required to recommend to the unrepresented party that they get independent legal advice. But if neither party has a solicitor, they can do what they like, and it's left to the same rules about fraud, undue influence etc as any other type of contract.
  • elsien
    elsien Posts: 35,433 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    user1977 said:
    elsien said:
    Neither party has a solicitor. The concern is that the buyer is the one who is taking advantage  - they have offered cash and said they will sort out the property transfer themselves. There's a lot more to it which I can't go into but a very real possibility that a vulnerable person is giving an asset away to an acquaintance at a fraction of its value. Safeguarding raised but I'm trying to understand if the property can just be handed over with the completion of the correct form?
    In short, yes.

    If one party had a solicitor then the solicitor would at least be professionally required to recommend to the unrepresented party that they get independent legal advice. But if neither party has a solicitor, they can do what they like, and it's left to the same rules about fraud, undue influence etc as any other type of contract.
    Thank you. That is what I needed to know. 
    All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.

    Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.
  • SDLT_Geek
    SDLT_Geek Posts: 2,835 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    If the deal is that the acquaintance buys the house and the vulnerable person is to be allowed to carry on living in it, on a tenancy or licence, then that is likely to be subject to the rules of "sale and rent back" which is regulated by the Financial Conduct Agency: see Q38E here https://www.handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook/PERG/14/5.html 
  • elsien
    elsien Posts: 35,433 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 8 March 2024 at 9:18PM
    That’s not the plan but thank you for the thought. 
    All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.

    Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.
  • Hoenir
    Hoenir Posts: 6,559 Forumite
    1,000 Posts First Anniversary Name Dropper
    elsien said:
     The concern is that the buyer is the one who is taking advantage  - they have offered cash and said they will sort out the property transfer themselves. 
     Sign here and I will deal with everything has red flags waving. Someone needs to step in. 
  • elsien
    elsien Posts: 35,433 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Someone is trying to. Hence, wanting to check how easy or otherwise the house transfer process can be. 
    All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.

    Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 349.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 452.9K Spending & Discounts
  • 242.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 619.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.3K Life & Family
  • 255.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.