We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Xinction Rebelión -v- Insurance

Well XR are targeting the City of London and Lloyds of London in particular next week about insurance enabling polluting companies to continue by providing insurance to them... so if I'm not around its because I've been burnt at the stake (or would that be too much CO2?) or maybe just flogged (with a non-animal/non-petrochemical whip) and thrown in the stocks. 

Comments

  • Removing insurance options is certainly an effective and practical way to do what governments are failing to.

    Good luck to them.
  • DullGreyGuy
    DullGreyGuy Posts: 18,613 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    Lloyds will already not directly insurer various industries like coal mining; others are on a watch list with syndicates having to report volumes and explain any increases against their ESG policy. 
  • Sea_Shell
    Sea_Shell Posts: 10,290 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 24 January 2025 at 6:00PM
    Removing insurance options is certainly an effective and practical way to do what governments are failing to.

    Good luck to them.

    It's a thin end of a wedge though isn't it.

    What industries are next on the list to be "de-insured", and on their watchlist?

    Airlines?
    Shipping?




    How's it going, AKA, Nutwatch? - 12 month spends to date = 3.24% of current retirement "pot" (as at end December 2025)
  • DullGreyGuy
    DullGreyGuy Posts: 18,613 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    And you have certain states in the US, unsurprisingly those with big fossil fuel industries, making it illegal for insurers to be licensed in the state if they take environmental factors into what business they write or pricing.  Most syndicates write on a non-admitted basis for surplus lines so aren't yet caught but noises are of states expanding their rules. 
  • TELLIT01
    TELLIT01 Posts: 18,612 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper PPI Party Pooper
    If anything they should go after financial institutions and insurers for enabling housing to be built on floodplains.  If banks wouldn't lend money to such properties and insurers wouldn't provide insurance, it would stop tomorrow.
  • DullGreyGuy
    DullGreyGuy Posts: 18,613 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    TELLIT01 said:
    If anything they should go after financial institutions and insurers for enabling housing to be built on floodplains.  If banks wouldn't lend money to such properties and insurers wouldn't provide insurance, it would stop tomorrow.
    Not many Home insurers in the City
  • Smithcom
    Smithcom Posts: 265 Forumite
    Fourth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 24 January 2025 at 6:00PM
    Removing insurance options is certainly an effective and practical way to do what governments are failing to.

    Good luck to them.
    Completely agree.  

    It will be brilliant when petrochemical companies, airlines, cruise liners, car manufacturers, certain battery manufacturers, alcohol manufacturers (and retailers/wholesalers), tobacco  manufacturers (and retailers/wholesalers), casinos, firework manufacturers, gas producers, fast food manufacturers and shops, munitions suppliers and manufacturers etc etc etc. are closed down.

    Then we can all hold hands and skip through the fields together.


  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 0 Newbie
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    edited 24 January 2025 at 6:00PM
    Sea_Shell said:
    Removing insurance options is certainly an effective and practical way to do what governments are failing to.

    Good luck to them.

    It's a thin end of a wedge though isn't it.

    What industries are next on the list to be "de-insured", and on their watchlist?

    Airlines?
    Shipping?




    Slippery slope fallacy.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.