We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Price Cap reporting - save £278 a year? Not really. More like about £25 during April-June.
What_time_is_it
Posts: 921 Forumite
in Energy
The reporting of the energy price cap really annoys me. I understand that it's a balance between accuracy and simplicity, but a price that changes 4 times a year shouldn't really be reported in terms of annual savings. Particularly for a product where usage is much higher in winter than in summer.
8
Comments
-
They have to report it in that way because the general public are generally idiots.4
-
I think most people are much smarter than most give them credit for. I don't like it when things are dumbed down. I do get the need for a simple approach of course, but I think this could be done within a quarterly time frame.la531983 said:They have to report it in that way because the general public are generally idiots.
e.g. "Energy prices have fallen for the next quarter. On average this means that your energy costs will be cheaper/more expensive than the previous quarter, but obviously the changing seasons mean that you will use more/less compared to the previous quarter. The saving/increase compared to if prices had stayed the same would be about £x (in this case a saving of about £25). Compared to the same quarter last year the price is £x more/less expensive."
I think that's quite straightforward. And then always include a reference to unit costs and standing charges for those that want more detail.1 -
The very fact they dont give the "cap" in terms of the max unit rate more or less confirms they think the general public are idiots, tbh.7
-
When they are changing the electric SC by c6.7p on average and in one region by a whopping c14p according to Ofgem regional tables (unless initial release wrong like last year) standing charge and unit rate.
To be fair though Ofgem do give SR regional averages for SC and kWh in announcements - its the press who concentrate on the cap figure in headlines.
And BBC says it includes £28 not the recent consultation £16 figure for estimated £3.1bn debt. That's 7.7p per day. Doesnt say if via SC or unit rates - or how split electric vs gas - anyone ?
Answer in another thread suggests unit rate - as cap SC change appears linked to changes in distribution charges.
https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/comment/80617884/#Comment_80617884
0 -
Changes to current chargesUnexpected temporary cost adjustments +£17Social and environmental schemes +£30Levelling pre pay to DD +£10Network costs -£13Wholesale cost of energy -£265Overall change -£238The additional cost of running pre payment has been passed on to everyone.
3 -
As expected - and might fly under the radar given the headlinesmolerat said:The additional cost of running pre payment has been passed on to everyone.1 -
This is a good thing. Removing the penalty previously paid by the most vulnerable/unable to pay, and spreading the cost between everyone. I actually like this.superkoopauk said:
As expected - and might fly under the radar given the headlinesmolerat said:The additional cost of running pre payment has been passed on to everyone.
This level of detail is good in a more in depth report. I just wish that the main media outlets would agree a simple way of reporting the price changes based on quarterly differences, with a comparison to if there was no change in prices, and a comparison to the same quarter in the previous year(s).0 -
Exactly this, enough distraction and hope people miss the various elements of cost, the same with the unpaid bill surcharge added because the government/Ofgem refuse to let energy suppliers deal properly with non-payers.superkoopauk said:
As expected - and might fly under the radar given the headlinesmolerat said:The additional cost of running pre payment has been passed on to everyone.1 -
Bit harsh! If you can't afford to pay, then you can't afford to pay. If you refuse to pay or have spent the money on non-essential items instead, then it's still very hard and very slow to get that money paid. Cutting people off is, to my mind, cruel. Raising fines that often also won't be paid can be a waste of time and effort, and putting people in prison costs a fortune and doesn't solve the problem upon release.MattMattMattUK said:
Exactly this, enough distraction and hope people miss the various elements of cost, the same with the unpaid bill surcharge added because the government/Ofgem refuse to let energy suppliers deal properly with non-payers.superkoopauk said:
As expected - and might fly under the radar given the headlinesmolerat said:The additional cost of running pre payment has been passed on to everyone.0 -
................................Scot_39 said:.
And BBC says it includes £28 not the recent consultation £16 figure for estimated £3.1bn debt. That's 7.7p per day.
3
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.6K Life & Family
- 261.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

