We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

MSE News: Martin Lewis: Is a Lifetime ISA win coming in the Budget?

1234568

Comments

  • silvermum
    silvermum Posts: 254 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    I hope any consultation will review the definition of a 'first time buyer/ homeowner' to allow young adults who may have inherited a share of a property to be included as first time buyers in future! It seems unfair that being left e.g. a 1/6th share of granny's retirement flat, which is then sold within a few months, defines them as having 'previously had an interest in property' and makes them ineligible for the current LISA? 
  • eskbanker
    eskbanker Posts: 38,618 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    silvermum said:
    I hope any consultation will review the definition of a 'first time buyer/ homeowner' to allow young adults who may have inherited a share of a property to be included as first time buyers in future! It seems unfair that being left e.g. a 1/6th share of granny's retirement flat, which is then sold within a few months, defines them as having 'previously had an interest in property' and makes them ineligible for the current LISA? 
    There is obviously the counter-argument that the scheme is intended to provide assistance to those in most need of help accumulating a deposit, so excluding those with such windfall lump sums could easily be justified.  Did you contribute to the last consultation, I don't know if it was in there?
  • jrawle
    jrawle Posts: 622 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper
    Definitely not a "win" for anyone who uses a Lifetime ISA for retirement saving, and is quite aware of the rules, knows they have to wait until 60 or lose an effective 6.25%. That's what we signed up for.

    I remember when MSE was for people savvy with money. Now Martin seems to treat it as a social service, often at the expense of those the site used to be for.
  • MSE_Helen_K
    MSE_Helen_K Posts: 175 MSE Staff
    Fifth Anniversary 10 Posts Photogenic
    Thanks eskbanker for flagging the LISA announcement in yesterday's Budget. There's a bit more on this from Martin in our news story here: 

    https://www.moneysavingexpert.com/news/2025/11/cash-isa-limit-cut-martin-lewis-budget/#lifetimeisa
  • eskbanker
    eskbanker Posts: 38,618 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Thanks eskbanker for flagging the LISA announcement in yesterday's Budget. There's a bit more on this from Martin in our news story here: 

    https://www.moneysavingexpert.com/news/2025/11/cash-isa-limit-cut-martin-lewis-budget/#lifetimeisa
    However, his claim there that:
    I have been promised by a very senior member of the Government, that this will include looking at increasing the £450,000 threshold of the existing LISA as the people who have those, cannot be left with a dead product
    needs to be treated with some caution, given the history of his predictions on this thread, including last year's:
    Lifetime ISA win coming in budget?!

    Good news! @POLITICOEurope has a scoop by @JamesFitzJourno that Chancellor will follow my suggestion and wipe the 6.25% Lisa withdrawal fine for anyone buying a home. If true, this'd fix the current dire system whereby when people are priced out and have to buy a home above £450,000 limit the state fines them to get access to their cash.

    It suggests, less firmly, the limit will rise to £500,000 too.
    and then last week's:

    I think one of two things will happen (I've been pushing for them):

    • They get rid of the fine if you're buying a bigger property (so you don't get the bonus, but do get all your money back).

    • They increase the threshold to somewhere in the £500,000s (which is where it would be with inflation if it'd increased since 2017 when it was launched).

    Or maybe both – nah actually – unlikely, only one!

  • jrawle said:
    Definitely not a "win" for anyone who uses a Lifetime ISA for retirement saving, and is quite aware of the rules, knows they have to wait until 60 or lose an effective 6.25%. That's what we signed up for.

    I remember when MSE was for people savvy with money. Now Martin seems to treat it as a social service, often at the expense of those the site used to be for.
    Quite the question that doesn't seem to be asked, signed up to a Lifetime ISA for retirement element (Lifetime), plan for a nice seperate pot from pension savings. If this product is to be scrapped where does it leave us, does it continue until everyone is over 60 with all bonuses (unlikely). The new product seems targetted at home buyers only so what would happen to our ISA savings, incl bonuses will we transfer to a normal isa and keep our bonuses (unlikely again, perceived too favourable) or will be be stuck in a 'dead' isa until 60 with unfavourable conditions ie no bonus, isa providers giving effectively minimum rates etc
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 120,497 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    jrawle said:
    Definitely not a "win" for anyone who uses a Lifetime ISA for retirement saving, and is quite aware of the rules, knows they have to wait until 60 or lose an effective 6.25%. That's what we signed up for.

    I remember when MSE was for people savvy with money. Now Martin seems to treat it as a social service, often at the expense of those the site used to be for.
    Quite the question that doesn't seem to be asked, signed up to a Lifetime ISA for retirement element (Lifetime), plan for a nice seperate pot from pension savings. If this product is to be scrapped where does it leave us, does it continue until everyone is over 60 with all bonuses (unlikely). The new product seems targetted at home buyers only so what would happen to our ISA savings, incl bonuses will we transfer to a normal isa and keep our bonuses (unlikely again, perceived too favourable) or will be be stuck in a 'dead' isa until 60 with unfavourable conditions ie no bonus, isa providers giving effectively minimum rates etc
    Historically, tax wrappers close for new contributions but those that have them retain the product.   Then, often longer down the road, tax wrappers will be amalgamated.

    For example, S226 RACs were replaced with personal pensions in 1988.   Then in 2006, S226s were given the same entitlements as personal pensions.   Or when PEPs ended, they maintained their PEP status but some years later, they were reclassfieid as ISAs.    TESSAs became cash ISAs.

    However, some wrappers still maintain their original terms and haven't been merged/changed.

    it won't ever become dead as it will still be available as a stocks & shares wrapper with full investment choices and most providers charge exactly the same as for LISAs as they do S&S ISAs.    The cash LISA market will almost certainly decline but nobody should be using a cash LISA for retirement planning.

    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • SnowMan
    SnowMan Posts: 3,841 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    From the HMRC Tax-free savings newsletter 19 - November 2025, published 27 November 2025
    5. Lifetime ISA
    The government will consult on introducing a new, first time buyer only product that will provide the bonus when a person uses it to buy a house, removing the need for a withdrawal charge and giving savers flexibility in case their circumstances change.


    I came, I saw, I melted
  • eskbanker
    eskbanker Posts: 38,618 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 28 November at 3:34PM
    Perhaps also worth noting that the budget statement included:
    4.230 Lifetime ISA Reform – The government will publish a consultation in early 2026 on the implementation of a new, simpler ISA product to support first time buyers to buy a home. Once available, this new product will be offered in place of the Lifetime ISA.
    which could mean that the LISA will be retained for retirement purposes - maybe S&S LISAs will continue and cash ones won't, although I imagine there could be industry reluctance to support an even wider product range, especially in the context of the relatively low number of providers offering LISAs in the first place....
  • newlease
    newlease Posts: 120 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10 Posts
    LISA should be scrapped. It is counter productive. These campaigns do not support first time buyers only increases house prices. Those with LISA should be given the opportunity to transfer to another ISA and the "bonus" money should be used in a more targeted way.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.7K Life & Family
  • 259.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.