Civil Partnership vs Living Together?

We are a hetrosexual couple who have no intentions of getting married.

We've been living together for a long time now and have mirror wills, but the although we have a joint account and spilt everything down the middle, the house and mortgage is in my partners name only (long story).

Apart from being able to give my partner my personal tax allowance are there any other financial or legal benefits for entering into a civil partnership?

Thanks.

Comments

  • DE_612183
    DE_612183 Posts: 3,367 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Not sure but if there was a split and it was not amicable when the division of financial assets is done it starts off on a 50/50 split - not sure if this is the same case if not married.
  • TonyMMM
    TonyMMM Posts: 3,419 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 16 February 2024 at 12:52PM
    Advantages of CP, or being married ( legally they are the same - except for CPs not being recognised in a few countries), are mainly to do with pensions, inheritance rights and IHT thresholds.  Some, but not all, of these can be worked around with properly set up wills.

    If either/both of you have occupational pensions you should check what the scheme rules are about a surviving partner being eligible to "inherit" any pension rights ....they can be very different.

    For most couples thinking about estate planning, it makes a lot of sense financially.
  • DullGreyGuy
    DullGreyGuy Posts: 17,179 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    Pensions and inheritance tax are the main two. Occupational pensions can only pay out to married/civil partners and not to unmarried partners - obviously this does vary by scheme. 

    A friend got married after 35 years of being together exactly because his pension only pays out to a married/civil partner at the time of retirement. 

    If you were to split up after partnership then the stating position is everything is 50/50 unless it can be proven that it should be otherwise. As an unmarried couple right now the stating position is you each own your own stuff unless you can prove you contributed to the other's. So more likely to have an uneven allocation unmarried. 

    Personally, don't know why they still have civil partnerships, should really have been dumped when gay marriage was legalised. Yes there is the 1% who have some issue against what marriage was 300 years ago but they can make their choices as they did before civil partnerships existed. These days just adds more crap to write to explain that when you say marriage then that also includes civil partnership 
  • If your partner dies and has assets exceeding £325k then you could find yourself needing to sell your home to pay an IHT bill. CPs have spousal exemption so regardless of the level of assets IHT will not be an issue on the first death.

    You have wills in place but do you also have lasting powers of attorney in place? If not that should be one of your priorities. 
  • Mojisola
    Mojisola Posts: 35,571 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    If you decide not to become CPs, it's worth getting sorting this out -


Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 349.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 452.9K Spending & Discounts
  • 242.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 619.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.3K Life & Family
  • 255.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.