We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Car finance commission claim


We have checked our records and can confirm that a commission was paid to the dealer in respect of the introduction of you to us. At the time this agreement was incepted there were no rules against the application of a discretionary commission model. While the FCA subsequently ruled against these, they were not applied retrospectively.
The FCA is now reviewing historical motor finance commission arrangements and sales practices so it is possible that this may result in a decision requiring us to respond.
Comments
-
At this time, you’re getting nothing. That may change in the future.2
-
thank you very much0
-
All you can do at this time is what you've done, register a complaint, now you wait until the FCA shares their findings and explains the way forward"You've been reading SOS when it's just your clock reading 5:05 "0
-
Many firms are responding that they did not use DCAs. Your response clearly does not do that.
Sounds like Hartwells may be paying out in due course
https://www.moneysavingexpert.com/reclaim/reclaim-car-finance/
0 -
proctordaniel said:Good evening all, I have just had an email back from hartwells my previous finance company, they have responded in less the 24 hours but if am honest am not sure what it means see below see what you can make of it thanks all.
We have checked our records and can confirm that a commission was paid to the dealer in respect of the introduction of you to us. At the time this agreement was incepted there were no rules against the application of a discretionary commission model. While the FCA subsequently ruled against these, they were not applied retrospectively.
The FCA is now reviewing historical motor finance commission arrangements and sales practices so it is possible that this may result in a decision requiring us to respond.
Paragraph 1The current hype is because some dealers were acting as brokers and were able to select different finance interest rates to offer to their customers, and received a higher commission for sealing the deal at a high rate (when the customer could have had the lower rate). This may have happened to you, certainly your dealer was paid a commisionThis was not against any rules at the time and perfectly "normal".The rules & regulations about finance changed and this is not allowed any more.Now the FCA are trying to apply the rules retrospectively to these deals (even though they were allowed at the time, I suppose if they are "unfair" now, they were then....)Paragraph 2When the FCA sort out when compensation is required and how much is appropriate, the lenders will be forced to action it- so we will have to do something then.So you just have to wait now that you have registered your claim and see what happens.The most sensible (and therefore least likely...) compensation would be to repay the extra interest paid compared to the lower rate the customer could have got, but there is wild speculation about refunding all the payments made!(Seems crazy- you'd have the car and all your money back!)I want to go back to The Olden Days, when every single thing that I can think of was better.....
(except air quality and Medical Science)
0 -
It's more that the FCA later explicitly banned the practice, there is a question of if the conflict of interests was always a problem even if not explicitly banned. The FCA seems really keen on conflicts of interest over the last couple of years as have to help a few clients (insurers) identify the differing scenarios that generate CoI and how they manage them at the regulators request.
At present its still IF compensation is required, their conclusion could be the practice was acceptable within the rules that applied at the time.0 -
facade said:proctordaniel said:Good evening all, I have just had an email back from hartwells my previous finance company, they have responded in less the 24 hours but if am honest am not sure what it means see below see what you can make of it thanks all.
We have checked our records and can confirm that a commission was paid to the dealer in respect of the introduction of you to us. At the time this agreement was incepted there were no rules against the application of a discretionary commission model. While the FCA subsequently ruled against these, they were not applied retrospectively.
The FCA is now reviewing historical motor finance commission arrangements and sales practices so it is possible that this may result in a decision requiring us to respond.
Paragraph 1The current hype is because some dealers were acting as brokers and were able to select different finance interest rates to offer to their customers, and received a higher commission for sealing the deal at a high rate (when the customer could have had the lower rate). This may have happened to you, certainly your dealer was paid a commisionThis was not against any rules at the time and perfectly "normal".The rules & regulations about finance changed and this is not allowed any more.Now the FCA are trying to apply the rules retrospectively to these deals (even though they were allowed at the time, I suppose if they are "unfair" now, they were then....)Paragraph 2When the FCA sort out when compensation is required and how much is appropriate, the lenders will be forced to action it- so we will have to do something then.So you just have to wait now that you have registered your claim and see what happens.The most sensible (and therefore least likely...) compensation would be to repay the extra interest paid compared to the lower rate the customer could have got, but there is wild speculation about refunding all the payments made!(Seems crazy- you'd have the car and all your money back!)
Once the FCA is done, assuming they rule that repayment is necessary, it's to be expected they would tell the lenders to refund the higher rate of interest plus the 8% simple interest "compensation" that they normally apply. Some people might get thousands, some might get hundreds, probably most will get 0 as they weren't affected. MSE talk of billions being refunded like PPI is pure speculation without any foundingSam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness:
People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.
1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.2K Spending & Discounts
- 243.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 597.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.6K Life & Family
- 256.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards