We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Response from car finance people telling me they had commission but it wasn't 'discretionary'!

-------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
I would appreciate any views on this and is it worth me pursuing it?
Thanks
Comments
-
According to DebtCamel discretionary commission was banned from January 2021 so wouldn't have applied when you took out the finance with 247.
more details here....
Car finance commission scandal - can you get a refund? · Debt Camel
I’m a Forum Ambassador and I support the Forum Team on Debt Free Wannabe and Old Style Money Saving boards. If you need any help on these boards, do let me know. Please note that Ambassadors are not moderators. Any posts you spot in breach of the Forum Rules should be reported via the report button, or by emailing forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com. All views are my own and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.
"Never retract, never explain, never apologise; get things done and let them howl.” Nellie McClung
⭐️🏅😇0 -
Hi, what do you make of this, regarding the discretionary commission on vehicle finance that my provider has sent to me:
-------------------------------------------------------We have now reviewed your agreement in detail and can confirm that your lender 247 Money did not operate a discretionary commission arrangement at the time you took out finance on vehiclePlease note, your finance started with 247 Money on the 30 September 2021.
<snip>
I would appreciate any views on this and is it worth me pursuing it?What is it you are trying to pursue?
Commission is allowed. Discretionary increases are not, and your finance agreement is after the ban on discretionary. There is nothing wrong here.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.1 -
pgibbyuk1 said:Hi, what do you make of this, regarding the discretionary commission on vehicle finance that my provider has sent to me:
-------------------------------------------------------We have now reviewed your agreement in detail and can confirm that your lender 247 Money did not operate a discretionary commission arrangement at the time you took out finance on vehiclePlease note, your finance started with 247 Money on the 30 September 2021.Therefore, we can confirm that all information relating to the finance agreement was provided to you in accordance with our regulatory obligations.Whilst we did receive a commission from the lender, this was not discretionary and therefore did not impact the interest rate on your agreement.
-------------------------------------------------------
I would appreciate any views on this and is it worth me pursuing it?
Thanks
There is nothing wrong with commissions in principle, there was a conflict of interest where the sales guy would get higher commission for giving you a higher APR than the lender was prepared to offer and so it had to be declared. That practice was outlawed before your loan was taken out. Your loan didn't break the rules.2 -
My husband and I bought a second-hand car in 2017 with Motonovo Finance. The interest rate was 9.5%. I sent them an email on the night Martin first discussed this and after 28 days had heard nothing. I sent them another email and a couple of days ago, received the following:
Discretionary Commission Arrangement
Hello,
Thank you for contacting us to find out if your Motor Finance Agreements had a discretionary commission arrangement. After an initial investigation we have concluded that your agreement(s) (12954521) for vehicle(s) (YR64FKZ) did not involve a discretionary commission arrangement. We have now closed this enquiry.
Quite frankly, I don't believe them. Do you think this is worth pursuing with The Financial Ombudsman?
Thank you for your response.
0 -
No, unless you have time to waste.1
-
What evidence do you have that there was a discretionary commission agreement in place?0
-
Quite frankly, I don't believe them. Do you think this is worth pursuing with The Financial Ombudsman?Quite frankly, I don't see why you wouldn't believe them. Most dealers didn't use DCA.
You don't have access to the FOS. All complaints about DCA are suspended. Plus, what evidence do you have to present the FOS to support your allegation that Motonovo are committing fraud?
I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.1 -
On the latest podcast Martin stated that if I company said you didn’t have a DCA he’d believe them as the consequences if the regulator found them to be lying would be serious.0
-
Dionyssia said:My husband and I bought a second-hand car in 2017 with Motonovo Finance. The interest rate was 9.5%. I sent them an email on the night Martin first discussed this and after 28 days had heard nothing. I sent them another email and a couple of days ago, received the following:
Discretionary Commission Arrangement
Hello,
Thank you for contacting us to find out if your Motor Finance Agreements had a discretionary commission arrangement. After an initial investigation we have concluded that your agreement(s) (12954521) for vehicle(s) (YR64FKZ) did not involve a discretionary commission arrangement. We have now closed this enquiry.
Quite frankly, I don't believe them. Do you think this is worth pursuing with The Financial Ombudsman?
Thank you for your response.
Sorry if you were expecting a payday but MSE loves to go all in with headlines about people getting squillions of pounds back without checking the factsSam Vimes' Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness:
People are rich because they spend less money. A poor man buys $10 boots that last a season or two before he's walking in wet shoes and has to buy another pair. A rich man buys $50 boots that are made better and give him 10 years of dry feet. The poor man has spent $100 over those 10 years and still has wet feet.
0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 349.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453K Spending & Discounts
- 242.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.3K Life & Family
- 255.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards