We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
The MSE Forum Team would like to wish you all a very Happy New Year. However, we know this time of year can be difficult for some. If you're struggling during the festive period, here's a list of organisations that might be able to help
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!
Claiming for damage caused in England, but company HQ in Scotland.
Comments
-
I don't see the relevance of this.sheramber said:
And forn N1DJetandy said:Some initial legal advice I've taken refers me to the N510 form for out of jurisdiction claims, as well as saying that I could claim against ATS, who's registered office is in Birmingham. Food for thought.
Disputing the claim
If you are being sued as an individual for a specified amount of money and you dispute the claim, the claim may be transferred to a local court i.e. the one nearest to or where you live or carry on business if different from the court where the claim was issued.
The OP isn't being sued, as an individual or otherwise. It is he who is considering suing two large national companies.0 -
I've not looked in detail yet, but they said the first tick box.ArbitraryRandom said:On what basis did they consider you didn't need permission (which box did they say you should tick)? Specifically with regard CPR 6.32(1)(a) and 6.32(1)(b)(iii) - you are party to an agreement conferring jurisdiction to Scotland.
And we said you can claim against the fitters... but there is a risk if you only claim against the fitters (they can push liability to black circle by pointing at the contract) and if you claim against both together then the jurisdiction question comes back into play.
But I'll say again - you want to try and build your evidence/present it to the company and give them chance to respond before you decide if you want to take court action or not... at the moment as far as you've shared on the thread, you don't have any contract, statute, caselaw or independent authority to support your claim.
I'm in communication with the company, and have suggested that I may go legal. And given all them reasons why. All I want is the wheel to be in at least as good a condition as when they took the car in. Why is the onus on me and why am I being made to feel this is unreasonable? It's not a knackered old car with lots of kerb damage, I take great care of it and it is in pristine condition. When the wheels are cleaned I'd say you would be hard pushed to distinguish them from new.0 -
That's likely because the guidance is for individuals - the alternatively is wading through the civil procedure rules or getting specific legal advice - but broadly speaking, the rules allow for the defendant (individual or company) to request a hearing in person, and that they can also request where the hearings is held and to appeal the jurisdiction... the court will be open to an appeal from the claimant if the requested location is unreasonable but it's not a given, especially as the contractual agreement includes an explicit term about jurisdiction.Alderbank said:
I don't see the relevance of this.sheramber said:
And forn N1DJetandy said:Some initial legal advice I've taken refers me to the N510 form for out of jurisdiction claims, as well as saying that I could claim against ATS, who's registered office is in Birmingham. Food for thought.
Disputing the claim
If you are being sued as an individual for a specified amount of money and you dispute the claim, the claim may be transferred to a local court i.e. the one nearest to or where you live or carry on business if different from the court where the claim was issued.
The OP isn't being sued, as an individual or otherwise. It is he who is considering suing two large national companies.I'm not an early bird or a night owl; I’m some form of permanently exhausted pigeon.0 -
If you didn't choose to buy from them then speak to whoever coerced or blackmailed you into using BlackcircleJetandy said:
I didn't choose Scottish, it was an online purchase and they sell and fit across the UK.DullGreyGuy said:Read the contract you agreed to, it should state if its England & Wales or Scotland for the legal jurisdiction.
Your choice to choose a Scottish company than a local one. It's why they say you acknowledge to agreeing to the terms by buying.Jetandy said:If I followed the Scottish process could I be asked to attend court in Scotland? Wouldn't seem fair.2 -
I've done that, but they still won't give me the photos...DullGreyGuy said:
If you didn't choose to buy from them then speak to whoever coerced or blackmailed you into using BlackcircleJetandy said:
I didn't choose Scottish, it was an online purchase and they sell and fit across the UK.DullGreyGuy said:Read the contract you agreed to, it should state if its England & Wales or Scotland for the legal jurisdiction.
Your choice to choose a Scottish company than a local one. It's why they say you acknowledge to agreeing to the terms by buying.Jetandy said:If I followed the Scottish process could I be asked to attend court in Scotland? Wouldn't seem fair.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.8K Spending & Discounts
- 246.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 260K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards