We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
Stamp Duty. The actual scenario.

DesWalker
Posts: 19 Forumite


Hi All,
My previous post talked in hypotheticals. It got some very helpful response particularly around the notion of replacing one’s main residence, but the replies have not quite addressed my specific circumstances. So here they are....
I have rented on the outskirts of Manchester for more than 20 years. I am fully resident here at this address. Council taxes, car insurance, voting register, bank accounts, the lot. There can be no question about this.
Ten years ago I bought a small apartment in Spain. I have used it for extended holidays, perhaps totalling 90 days per year. I have never claimed or sought any form of residence in Spain and indeed it is questionable about whether I would even qualify. I travel back and forth like a tourist when my job allows.
I now wish to buy a flat close to where I currently live to use as my main residence as I am sick of paying rent on my current main residence.
I find it it very hard to believe that someone in my circumstances (moving out of rented and into my own property) is expected to pay the stamp duty surcharge.
I would very much appreciate any thoughts.
Des
My previous post talked in hypotheticals. It got some very helpful response particularly around the notion of replacing one’s main residence, but the replies have not quite addressed my specific circumstances. So here they are....
I have rented on the outskirts of Manchester for more than 20 years. I am fully resident here at this address. Council taxes, car insurance, voting register, bank accounts, the lot. There can be no question about this.
Ten years ago I bought a small apartment in Spain. I have used it for extended holidays, perhaps totalling 90 days per year. I have never claimed or sought any form of residence in Spain and indeed it is questionable about whether I would even qualify. I travel back and forth like a tourist when my job allows.
I now wish to buy a flat close to where I currently live to use as my main residence as I am sick of paying rent on my current main residence.
I find it it very hard to believe that someone in my circumstances (moving out of rented and into my own property) is expected to pay the stamp duty surcharge.
I would very much appreciate any thoughts.
Des
0
Comments
-
I went back to look for your previous post for context and you've a previous one to that talking about trying to sell a UK property in 2017 (not 20yrs ago) ??0
-
Thanks Wonka. Please disregard that post. I was actually in the exact same scenario as now back in 2017. Renting, wanting to buy, owning a holiday home abroad but not having the right or even the desire to live there full time, and wanting to know why I am expected to pay the surcharge to move my main residence from rented to owned. It just doesn’t seem fair !!!0
-
DesWalker said:
I find it it very hard to believe that someone in my circumstances (moving out of rented and into my own property) is expected to pay the stamp duty surcharge.
You can avoid it by first disposing of your Spanish property.1 -
I am manifestly “replacing” my main residence. Why do those who own rather than rent their former main residence get preferential treatment ? Thanks in advance.0
-
Replacing means disposing of your mani residence. As you are not disposing of your main residence you need to pay the higher stamp duty as you are incresing your property owning form one to teo.
That is how the Government drew up the rules.1 -
DesWalker said:I am manifestly “replacing” my main residence. Why do those who own rather than rent their former main residence get preferential treatment ? Thanks in advance.
They get preferential treatment because they're not increasing the number of properties they own, whereas you are.1 -
is your share of the Spanish property under £40k?1
-
DesWalker said:I am manifestly “replacing” my main residence. Why do those who own rather than rent their former main residence get preferential treatment ? Thanks in advance.
I am sure that a huge chunk of those people selling and buying would absolutely love a holiday house in Spain but cant afford it.0 -
DesWalker said:Hi All,
My previous post talked in hypotheticals. It got some very helpful response particularly around the notion of replacing one’s main residence, but the replies have not quite addressed my specific circumstances. So here they are....
I have rented on the outskirts of Manchester for more than 20 years. I am fully resident here at this address. Council taxes, car insurance, voting register, bank accounts, the lot. There can be no question about this.
Ten years ago I bought a small apartment in Spain. I have used it for extended holidays, perhaps totalling 90 days per year. I have never claimed or sought any form of residence in Spain and indeed it is questionable about whether I would even qualify. I travel back and forth like a tourist when my job allows.
I now wish to buy a flat close to where I currently live to use as my main residence as I am sick of paying rent on my current main residence.
I find it it very hard to believe that someone in my circumstances (moving out of rented and into my own property) is expected to pay the stamp duty surcharge.
I would very much appreciate any thoughts.
Des
It sounds highly unlikely to me, but the only possible angle I could think of is if you had signed a lease for over seven years on the rented property and now surrender that lease. That lease could then count as a "major interest". In my experience most tenants would sign a short tenancy, for say one year, which might be renewed or allowed to run on. That is not the same as being granted a lease for over seven years, even if the period of occupation exceeds 7 years.2
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.1K Spending & Discounts
- 243K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.5K Life & Family
- 255.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards