We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Gifted Property Whilst On PIP and Support Group ESA
Comments
-
muldesia said:Spoonie_Turtle said:muldesia said:Spoonie_Turtle said:muldesia said:elsien said:You also need to consider the ongoing service charges, maintenance, costs et cetera and whether he will be able to afford this from benefits.
He will then have the issue that if he can’t manage to live on his own, and the flat is in his name, it will count as an asset for benefits purposes if he has to then live somewhere somewhere else. That money could then have to be used for him to live on until it gets down to the benefits thresholds.If there is a reasonable amount of doubt about his ability to manage, I do think he should seriously consider renting first if he is able to find a property that will accept him.
This would seem to be a case of hope for the best but plan for the other scenarios as well.
But I take on board what you say about how if he moves away from the place he's bought, perhaps back with my mum, that property will now be viewed as an asset my brother holds, and that could affect his benefits. Do you know if that situation would affect either PIP or ESA?
Many thanks for the help!
Forget PIP, it's not affected by anything financial at all.
Do you know if that type of ESA would be affected should he move back with my mum, and has that property in his name?
Many thanks!
The type is whether it's new-style, income-based, the old contributions-based, or a mix of income and contributions-based. When did he start his ESA claim, what year?
(If it had been new-style e.g. from late 2018 onwards then it definitely would not be affected by potentially having a flat in his name. But it's not that so if any of it is income-based, it would be affected.)0 -
muldesia said:Alice_Holt said:HillStreetBlues said:Alice_Holt said:HillStreetBlues said:Alice_Holt said:I can't see a problem even if the ESA is income related (or partly income related) because (as I read the OP) the flat will be bought for him without any monies moving into his account.
I can't see how this could be seen as money laundering - can you explain how it might?
It's the source of funds that is important - https://www.propertymark.co.uk/professional-standards/consumer-guides/buying-selling-houses/aml-proof-of-funds.html
More to the point - The OP and his mother should be aware that gifting some of her house proceeds is likely to impact on any potential help with future care costs.
Let's Be Careful Out There1 -
Reasonably forseeable rather than must, I believeAll shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.
Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.0 -
elsien said:Reasonably forseeable rather than must, I believe
but happy to be corrected
Let's Be Careful Out There0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.3K Spending & Discounts
- 243.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.7K Life & Family
- 256.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards