We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Wow. I received a PSPO fine for driving a standard car past a noise camera! No right to appeal too!
 
            
                
                    ar1390                
                
                    Posts: 8 Forumite
         
             
         
         
             
                         
            
                        
             
         
                    Hi guys,
So I received this in the post, it is a FPN for passing a noise camera too loudly.


The noise camera was set up in this area as there is regularly a car meet here during the day on weekends. At the time in question, the car was travelling alone past the camera at 11pm on a weekday. It wasn’t being driven excessively aggressively, being revved or speeding up repeatedly like it suggests. I would 100% appeal this but it says you have to wait for a court summons to do that and then the fine can be much more.
My issues are:
Do they not have to prove who the driver was, as this is technically a criminal offence from my limited understanding?
Would they also not have to prove the part about “revving” and “repeated sudden acceleration" as well as "as to cause a public nuisance"? Is that possible by just having a video camera with a decibel meter attached?
I understand what these cameras were set up for. I've seen people parked up on Sloane Street revving with pops and bangs maps and modified exhausts. That's not what happened here or what they were set up for, the car was literally driving past it, and it is a standard car with a non-modified factory fitted exhaust.
Has anyone got any experience with these? Are they enforceable if taken to court, or do I have a good chance of beating it? If slim chances I'll just pay it.
Thanks for your help!
                
                So I received this in the post, it is a FPN for passing a noise camera too loudly.


The noise camera was set up in this area as there is regularly a car meet here during the day on weekends. At the time in question, the car was travelling alone past the camera at 11pm on a weekday. It wasn’t being driven excessively aggressively, being revved or speeding up repeatedly like it suggests. I would 100% appeal this but it says you have to wait for a court summons to do that and then the fine can be much more.
My issues are:
Do they not have to prove who the driver was, as this is technically a criminal offence from my limited understanding?
Would they also not have to prove the part about “revving” and “repeated sudden acceleration" as well as "as to cause a public nuisance"? Is that possible by just having a video camera with a decibel meter attached?
I understand what these cameras were set up for. I've seen people parked up on Sloane Street revving with pops and bangs maps and modified exhausts. That's not what happened here or what they were set up for, the car was literally driving past it, and it is a standard car with a non-modified factory fitted exhaust.
Has anyone got any experience with these? Are they enforceable if taken to court, or do I have a good chance of beating it? If slim chances I'll just pay it.
Thanks for your help!
0        
            Comments
- 
            I think you need to take this to pepipoo this forum is mainly for private parking tickets.
 2
- 
            ar1390 said:
 I understand what these cameras were set up for. I've seen people parked up on Sloane Street revving with pops and bangs maps and modified exhausts. That's not what happened here or what they were set up for, the car was literally driving past it, and it is a standard car with a non-modified factory fitted exhaust.
 Has anyone got any experience with these? Are they enforceable if taken to court, or do I have a good chance of beating it? If slim chances I'll just pay it.We don't know how loud your car is/was, I would guess it's not a standard car?
 1
- 
            No but it is a standard car, that's why it's even more annoying! No modification, no aftermarket exhaust, bog standard factory car0
- 
            Oh unless you meant what type of car it is? It's a Porsche, so yes it's a sports car but its still factory spec and not a V12 Lamborghini0
- 
            See what the experts on pepipoo forum say.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
 CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
 Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD2
- 
            ar1390 said:No but it is a standard car, that's why it's even more annoying! No modification, no aftermarket exhaust, bog standard factory car
 So it is still quite possibly obnoxiously loud, just not deafeningly obnoxiously loud.ar1390 said:Oh unless you meant what type of car it is? It's a Porsche, so yes it's a sports car but its still factory spec and not a V12 Lamborghini
 1
- 
            Quite possibly, but no warning signs that there are noise cameras in the area so owners of "obnoxious" cars can stay away seems a little unfair0
- 
            
 There is no need for warning signs, if the volume exceeds the level deemed a public nuisance then a fine can be levied, I only wish more councils and police forces would do more to tackle those who undertake antisocial behaviour using their cars engines.ar1390 said:Quite possibly, but no warning signs that there are noise cameras in the area so owners of "obnoxious" cars can stay away seems a little unfair0
- 
            
 There might be.MattMattMattUK said:
 There is no need for warning signsar1390 said:Quite possibly, but no warning signs that there are noise cameras in the area so owners of "obnoxious" cars can stay away seems a little unfair
 Pepipoo expert posters will know.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
 CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
 Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD1
- 
            Is a photo enough to prove noise / speeding up repeatedly? I would presume they have video with sound too if they are confident It could be taken to court. Does say on there you can phone them up to discuss the penalty though.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
 
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
 
          
         
 
         