PCN from PCM

Coupon-mad

Just include what you've got.

And expose the holes in their WS. Who signed it? Solicitor or just a paralegal at Gladstones?

See the thread by aza123 which has a recent WS with Chan & Akande

RV44

Coupon-mad said:

Just include what you've got.

And expose the holes in their WS. Who signed it? Solicitor or just a paralegal at Gladstones?

See the thread by aza123 which has a recent WS with Chan & Akande

It was a paralegal (and they can't attend the hearing) and I'm including elements from aza123's WS and other WSs where the paralegal's name has come up. With regards to Chan & Akande, after I filed my defence in 2024, the Judge directed Gladstones to be very clear on the nature of breach of contract and to file 'Particulars of the Claim' by a certain date. Gladstones then came back with a 'Particulars of the Claim' and below are the key highlights:

1. Their client is the approved and authorised parking management provider to the landlord. (With client-landlord contract as evidence)
2. The signage around the residential neighbourhood clearly points out that a valid parking permit must be displayed on the windscreen/dashboard AND that they do not operate on vehicle whitelist basis, a direct counterpoint to the defence filed (with photographs of the actual signage and aerial photographs of the neighbourhood with marked placements of the signage)
3. They claim the breach was because the parking permit was not displayed (with photographs of the vehicle, interior and exterior)

Based on the above, should I still use Chan & Akande?

Coupon-mad

Paralegal? Who?

Read the Mazur thread.