We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Barclays deemed 4th floor flat close to Central London to have no sustainable resale potential
Comments
-
user1977 said:
3rd floor flats with no lift are pretty commonplace in urban Scotland, but I'm not aware of any regular surcharges for deliveries etc (though I expect movers would charge more) or couriers refusing to come upstairs. Doubt 4th floor really matters from that point of view.Albermarle said:there is also delivery drivers where some will just dump a parcel in the foyer. Even more difficult what about removal people or people delivering sofas, washing machines. Probably extra charges every time.I currently live on the fourth floor without a lift, which is why I don't perceive it as an issue. However, being in my 30s and in good health, I acknowledge others may have different perspectives.
Regarding deliveries, delivery drivers typically have a limited time per delivery, and even if there is a lift, they usually don't go up. Parcels are usually left on the ground floor.
1 -
There must be tens of thousands of mansion flats in central London that fall into this category. Try someone without such a crude blanket policy.
How this will affect the resale value in 25 year time is anyone's guess. It certainly reduces the potential market, but doesn't eliminate it.No free lunch, and no free laptop
1 -
We do a lot of shared ownership business around London (W7, UB1, UB6, TW4 etc) in blocks of five storeys or more. It is one of the first questions on the list when we get such a case it's such a regular issue.I am a mortgage broker. You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Please do not send PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.1
-
That's an interesting revelation. Initially, I thought the concern with this property was due to the absence of elevators, which might deter some individuals. However, it appears to apply to all properties with five storeys or morekingstreet said:We do a lot of shared ownership business around London (W7, UB1, UB6, TW4 etc) in blocks of five storeys or more. It is one of the first questions on the list when we get such a case it's such a regular issue.
0 -
I'm surprised he didn't check because it's common place for lenders to require a lift for 4 or more stories. The lending criteria is clearly published.1st_time_london_buyer said:
I'm working with a broker and even he was surprised that this became an issue, considering the property's location in London. He mentioned experiencing mortgage refusals from lenders based on seemingly arbitrary reasons, such as proximity to a take away restaurant that might occasionally cause the area to smell?!kingstreet said:
I wouldn't like to speculate. If I had such an enquiry I would research the available options as that is what pays the bills.1st_time_london_buyer said:
So that means that all of the 20 plus fourth floor flats in this development, which was build in 1938, are unmortgageable?kingstreet said:It's pretty much standard across the board. Blocks over four storeys must have a lift. Barclays is not out on its own in this regard.
What does your broker say?I'm optimistic that this might be another instance of subjective judgment by the surveyor. Maybe I shouldn't be?
You will find someone else, they may just be a little less mainstream.2 -
I'm presently exploring another lender, but I find myself at the mercy of the valuer's judgment now.
As long as the property's valuation accurately considers its fourth-floor location without a lift, what's the issue? Many young, first-time buyers would gladly consider it as a stepping stone onto the property ladder. Later in life, they can opt for a more suburban setting with a garden, and sell it to another set of young first-time buyers working in the city.
Considering the current housing challenges in London and the difficulty in buying your first property, excluding these types of properties from the reach of young individuals seeking a mortgage should be considered a disservice.
0 -
The issue is that lenders are averse to properties which have features which may make them more difficult to sell quickly, so they have criteria which deem properties unsuitable from their point of view. Those can be a bit clunky, but things which make a block "multistorey" or "too high to not have a lift" are often among them.1st_time_london_buyer said:As long as the property's valuation accurately considers its fourth-floor location without a lift, what's the issue?
Admittedly this can get a bit chicken-and-egg ("this would be difficult to sell because buyers would have trouble getting a mortgage..."), but it's something you're going to have to run with.2 -
It tends to only be very large items... when our fridge and freezer were delivered we were asked how many stairs there were so well beyond just how many flights.user1977 said:
3rd floor flats with no lift are pretty commonplace in urban Scotland, but I'm not aware of any regular surcharges for deliveries etc (though I expect movers would charge more) or couriers refusing to come upstairs. Doubt 4th floor really matters from that point of view.Albermarle said:there is also delivery drivers where some will just dump a parcel in the foyer. Even more difficult what about removal people or people delivering sofas, washing machines. Probably extra charges every time.
Lived in a 4th floor flat in Scotland without a lift... was ok most the time but occasionally just really didn't feel like the climb. There was no door at ground level, just an opening to the staircase, so delivery guys hopefully did come to the door.
My personal favourite was the time we had a knock on the door, answered it and there was a guy panting away from the climb. After he finally got his breath back he asked if we'd ever considered getting a conservatory? We said yes instantly and he said the Designer would be calling to draw up some plans... he never did
2 -
Perhaps he meant a balcony?...DullGreyGuy said:
My personal favourite was the time we had a knock on the door, answered it and there was a guy panting away from the climb. After he finally got his breath back he asked if we'd ever considered getting a conservatory? We said yes instantly and he said the Designer would be calling to draw up some plans... he never did
0 -
The photo was something like:Emily_Joy said:
Perhaps he meant a balcony?...DullGreyGuy said:
My personal favourite was the time we had a knock on the door, answered it and there was a guy panting away from the climb. After he finally got his breath back he asked if we'd ever considered getting a conservatory? We said yes instantly and he said the Designer would be calling to draw up some plans... he never did

But as the designer never arranged the appointment we will never know1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.8K Spending & Discounts
- 246.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 260K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

