We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Investments
Comments
-
I think the only question mark is whether 80/20 is maybe too cautious. She scored 5 out of 10 on a risk scale and is looking for slow and steady growth.poli123 said:
Agreed a single multi asset fund is definitely more sensible and hence we requested a review and received the advice for a 80/20 Fund..masonic said:Sounds like she has quite a bit more risk in her current holdings (about ~70% equities if I understand your description correctly). There isn't really any need to have multiple different funds for this sort of portfolio, so consolidating into one multi-asset fund will simplify things without any great loss of diversity. A reduction in risk could be sensible at this juncture, especially if there is no need to take risk and/or the assets are being preserved as a legacy (and therefore may need to be sold at short notice at some unknown point in the future).
In investing terms growth normally means growth above inflation. An 80/20 fund could struggle with this.
Maybe another chat with the advisor along these lines could be useful to see what they say.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards