We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

I own my house outright by myself, how can my partner get a mortgage on half?

Hi, 
I own my property outright and my partner would essentially like to get a mortgage to own 50% to essentially buy me out of half of the home so that we own it together. 
He is not yet on any deeds and we are wanting to know any information that could help us. 
How would this work as we know I would have to be named on the mortgage but as a non payable party. And what if we want to sell on later down the line and buy a bigger house together? Would I get the 50% of my half back in cash too? 
Apologies if this is confusing, we can't seem to find a straightforward answer and seem to be going around in circles. 
Thank you for your time! 
«1

Comments

  • kingstreet
    kingstreet Posts: 39,056 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 23 November 2023 at 4:23PM
    No. Ownership and mortgage would have to be joint. You can't mortgage a portion of a property which also belongs to someone else.
    I am a mortgage broker. You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Please do not send PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.
  • Exodi
    Exodi Posts: 3,395 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 23 November 2023 at 4:32PM
    No. Ownership and mortgage would have to be joint. You can't mortgage a portion of a property which also belongs to someone else.
    @kingstreet is infinitely more knowledgeable on this than me so may correct me, but I believe the reason for this is because let's say the OP and the partner were joint owners on the deeds, but the partner was solely named on the mortgage.

    Let's say the partner decides to stop paying the mortgage for a long time and the bank wants their money back, and it escalates to a repossession. The bank now has a complicated situation in which they're trying to sell a house which someone else also owns, that was not a party to the contract. What if the OP don't want to sell their house? It is very difficult to sell half a house.

    Rather than get involved in nonsense like this, it is the status quo that people on the deeds = people on the mortgage and vice versa.
    Know what you don't
  • kingstreet
    kingstreet Posts: 39,056 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    HSBC used to offer an indirect charge product that allowed more owners than borrowers but it hasn't been available for a couple of years.
    I am a mortgage broker. You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Please do not send PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.
  • user1977
    user1977 Posts: 16,470 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Sixth Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 23 November 2023 at 5:10PM
    Exodi said:
    No. Ownership and mortgage would have to be joint. You can't mortgage a portion of a property which also belongs to someone else.
    The bank now has a complicated situation in which they're trying to sell a house which someone else also owns, that was not a party to the contract. What if the OP don't want to sell their house? It is very difficult to sell half a house.

    To clarify (maybe!), in any case all the owners need to grant the legal charge (the thing which is actually the mortgage and gets registered). So it's not possible for there to be a mortgage at all unless all the owners sign up to the security being put over the property.

    But it's legally possible to have only one party who needs to repay the loan. But the banks don't like that, because of the potential headaches about the mismatch between the parties (e.g. what if the non-borrowing owner complains about not being properly advised, they weren't even getting the benefit of the loan, they're not entitled to know what's happening with the repayments, etc).
  • Just to clarify I'm fine with my name being put on the mortgage however my partner would be and is absolutely fine with being the sole payer of it. I know it has to be a joint mortgage or remortgage with his name on the deed too. But what would happen if we sold the house in the future?
  • Just to clarify I'm fine with my name being put on the mortgage however my partner would be and is absolutely fine with being the sole payer of it. I know it has to be a joint mortgage or remortgage with his name on the deed too. But what would happen if we sold the house in the future?
    You need to set up tenants in common with a declaration of trust to protect your share.
  • Emmia
    Emmia Posts: 4,438 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Fourth Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    And if your relationship goes belly up? I'd invest/save the 50% so you can buy him out if necessary.
  • user1977
    user1977 Posts: 16,470 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Sixth Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper

    what would happen if we sold the house in the future?
    The mortgage would need to be repaid.
  • fergie_
    fergie_ Posts: 230 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    Another approach would be to seek legal advice and draw up some kind of agreement where your partner is gradually 'buying' half the house. In other words, rather than taking out a mortgage or loan, they simply make payments to you (with or without interest) over the agreed time for the agreed amount.
  • 400ixl
    400ixl Posts: 4,016 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    Do you need the lump sum? If not, then why pay interest on money you don't need to?

    Would it not be better your partner just pays you a monthly sum and you get some form of legal document drawn up that allow that money to purchase a growing percentage of the property over time.
Meet your Ambassadors

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 347.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 251.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 452.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 240K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 616.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 175.3K Life & Family
  • 253.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.