We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Junior S&S ISA
newbieni
Posts: 241 Forumite
My partner and I have crossed swords on what to do for our two children (1 and 3).
I was going to set up another Life Strategy within my Vanguard portfolio for them but I can't do this and then I felt adding money to my existing portfolio for them was going to get confusing and difficult to manage.
My partner wants to setup a S&S ISA with Hargreaves and Lansdown for each of them. We both share concerns about irresponsibility at 16 my partner thinks we can transfer the money out before they become 16 and hold a separate pot somewhere else until they're wise enough to manage the money. I don't think this is possible or even necessarily a good idea. I also thought Fidelity might be a better option for a platform.
Is our thinking flawed?
I was going to set up another Life Strategy within my Vanguard portfolio for them but I can't do this and then I felt adding money to my existing portfolio for them was going to get confusing and difficult to manage.
My partner wants to setup a S&S ISA with Hargreaves and Lansdown for each of them. We both share concerns about irresponsibility at 16 my partner thinks we can transfer the money out before they become 16 and hold a separate pot somewhere else until they're wise enough to manage the money. I don't think this is possible or even necessarily a good idea. I also thought Fidelity might be a better option for a platform.
Is our thinking flawed?
0
Comments
-
A lot of people decide to hold the money in their own name rather than the child's name for that reason. Often using a separate fund. That is easy on a whole of market platform as you can use HSBC GS for your holdings (HSBC being slightly better than VLS) but then hold VLS for the child.
HL is an expensive platform for UT/OEIC funds. So, alternative whole of market platforms may be better.
S&S ISAs are held in your name (or your partner). So, if you wanted one each, then one of you would do child 1 and the other would do child 2. If it is in the child's name then the Junior ISA would be used but accessibility becomes the issue and you want to avoid that.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.2 -
There are quite a few threads on this subject. You have two basic alternatives.
You open up Junior ISA's for them . Fidelity and HL both offer these with zero platform charges. They will get access to the money at 18. You would not be able to transfer the money back out to yourselves at a later stage.
You invest in your names and then give them the money when you feel it is appropriate. This of course will use up your own ISA allowances, unless you invest outside an ISA where you may have to pay tax.
You could do a bit of both. If they blow some money at 18, then its not the end of the world, in fact it is normal behaviour for someone at that age and a good lesson in 'when its gone its gone'.
Similar thread on same page
Long term child savings advice — MoneySavingExpert Forum
0 -
Although your children will have control of JISA from 16 but they can’t withdraw from it until they are 18.1
-
My partner wants to setup a S&S ISA with Hargreaves and Lansdown for each of them. We both share concerns about irresponsibility at 16 my partner thinks we can transfer the money out before they become 16 and hold a separate pot somewhere else until they're wise enough to manage the money. I don't think this is possible or even necessarily a good idea. I also thought Fidelity might be a better option for a platform.No, you can't.
See
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/money-mentor/article/should-i-pick-a-junior-stocks-shares-isa-or-a-cash-isa/
See
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/money-mentor/article/best-junior-stocks-shares-isa/
Scroll down toTop five self-invested junior ISAs
1 -
Could I in theory have two Life Strategy holdings with Vanguard?dunstonh said:A lot of people decide to hold the money in their own name rather than the child's name for that reason. Often using a separate fund. That is easy on a whole of market platform as you can use HSBC GS for your holdings (HSBC being slightly better than VLS) but then hold VLS for the child.
HL is an expensive platform for UT/OEIC funds. So, alternative whole of market platforms may be better.
S&S ISAs are held in your name (or your partner). So, if you wanted one each, then one of you would do child 1 and the other would do child 2. If it is in the child's name then the Junior ISA would be used but accessibility becomes the issue and you want to avoid that.0 -
If you mean that you're using Vanguard's platform for both then I believe they'd need to be different holdings, i.e. you could, say, hold some LS60 and LS80 but not two separate pots of LS60 if that's what you meant?newbieni said:Could I in theory have two Life Strategy holdings with Vanguard?1 -
Thank you. Yes that is what I meant, I thought this might be a clean way to manage them.eskbanker said:
If you mean that you're using Vanguard's platform for both then I believe they'd need to be different holdings, i.e. you could, say, hold some LS60 and LS80 but not two separate pots of LS60 if that's what you meant?newbieni said:Could I in theory have two Life Strategy holdings with Vanguard?0 -
The cleanest way would be a JISA each, but as suggested above, the next cleanest way would be for one parent to hold the investment for one child, and the other for the other, if there's a desire to retain parental financial control past 18.newbieni said:
Thank you. Yes that is what I meant, I thought this might be a clean way to manage them.eskbanker said:
If you mean that you're using Vanguard's platform for both then I believe they'd need to be different holdings, i.e. you could, say, hold some LS60 and LS80 but not two separate pots of LS60 if that's what you meant?newbieni said:Could I in theory have two Life Strategy holdings with Vanguard?2 -
I want to get my eldest setup as a priority as they're 3 and I've left it a bit late. What do I do outside of a JISA?eskbanker said:
The cleanest way would be a JISA each, but as suggested above, the next cleanest way would be for one parent to hold the investment for one child, and the other for the other, if there's a desire to retain parental financial control past 18.newbieni said:
Thank you. Yes that is what I meant, I thought this might be a clean way to manage them.eskbanker said:
If you mean that you're using Vanguard's platform for both then I believe they'd need to be different holdings, i.e. you could, say, hold some LS60 and LS80 but not two separate pots of LS60 if that's what you meant?newbieni said:Could I in theory have two Life Strategy holdings with Vanguard?0 -
Not sure there's anything to add beyond what's already been discussed? If you don't want to go down the JISA route then you need to hold investments within one or more adult S&S ISAs in the names of parents, and if you want to hold the same investments for each child then you can either lump them all together and keep records of what's whose, or hold them in separate ISAs held by each parent.newbieni said:
I want to get my eldest setup as a priority as they're 3 and I've left it a bit late. What do I do outside of a JISA?eskbanker said:
The cleanest way would be a JISA each, but as suggested above, the next cleanest way would be for one parent to hold the investment for one child, and the other for the other, if there's a desire to retain parental financial control past 18.newbieni said:
Thank you. Yes that is what I meant, I thought this might be a clean way to manage them.eskbanker said:
If you mean that you're using Vanguard's platform for both then I believe they'd need to be different holdings, i.e. you could, say, hold some LS60 and LS80 but not two separate pots of LS60 if that's what you meant?newbieni said:Could I in theory have two Life Strategy holdings with Vanguard?1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
