Teacher's Pensions and widow's pension

My Dad had a pension from TP when he retired in 2001. When he died in late 2015, my Mum became entitled to a long-term widow's (dependent's / spouse's - not sure of the precise term) pension in a reduced amount.

In May 2022, TP wrote to Mum asking her to complete and return a document to confirm she continued to be eligible for the pension (i.e., hadn't remarried, formed a civil partnership, or started co-habiting etc.). She didn't return that form, but when TP wrote a reminder letter to her in June 2022, she did complete and return that form. She has notes from that time to indicate the dates when she did so.

I have just spotted, when going through her finances with her over the last few days, that the income from Dad's pension reference number stopped in July 2022. 

Given the coincidence in timing, I suspect that the two are linked. Either Mum's completed form wasn't received by TP, or it was received but then lost / not processed properly.

Does this sound a likely explanation?

I have drafted a letter for her to send to TP, which she will send tomorrow via recorded delivery or similar to be sure. We've asked for an investigation and explanation.

If the two are indeed linked, what is reasonable to expect by way of resolution? Mum has complied with the second request to return the form, and should not be penalised as a result of any subsequent postal or administrative issues.

I would hope that they would reinstate the pension and pay the arrears, but is this a reasonable expectation?

Thanks for any thoughts.
«134

Comments

  • What happened when she asked TPS why the payments had stopped?
  • Were they married? If they were her pension should be for life regardless is she remarried or not. 
  • hugheskevi
    hugheskevi Posts: 4,428 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 29 October 2023 at 11:01PM
    Were they married? If they were her pension should be for life regardless is she remarried or not. 
    Note the scheme member retired in 2001. From this House of Commons Briefing Paper:
    2.2 Teachers
    In June 2006, the Department for Education and Skills issued proposals for reform of the Teachers’ Pension Scheme. This included a proposal for survivors’ pensions to be paid for life. This would apply both to new entrants from 1 January 2007 and for existing members on that date.12 The change was legislated for in the Teachers’ Pensions etc (Reform Amendments) regulations 2006 (SI 2006 No. 3122). However, it did not apply where the scheme member retired before 1 January 2007. The Explanatory Memorandum said:

    Schedule 3 paragraph 50 amends regulation E30 (duration of long term-survivor pensions) so that survivor pensions are payable for the lifetime of the recipient. Widow, widower and civil partner pensions payable in respect of a member who retired from a date prior to 1 January 2007 will be remain liable to cessation on the recipient’s remarriage, civil partnership or cohabitation.
  • xylophone
    xylophone Posts: 45,541 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 29 October 2023 at 11:32PM
    Your mother has only just noticed that she hasn't received her pension for over a year?

    Has there been any  decrease in  the amount of Contracted Out Deduction shown on her state pension letter for 23/24?
  • zagubov
    zagubov Posts: 17,936 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Is this the same in all home nations?
    There is no honour to be had in not knowing a thing that can be known - Danny Baker
  • xylophone
    xylophone Posts: 45,541 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Were they married? If they were her pension should be for life regardless is she remarried or not. 

    No. See

    https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN07109/SN07109.pdf

    2. Changes in individual schemes

    Each of the main public service schemes had rules providing for a survivors’ pension to be removed on remarriage of cohabitation. These rules were removed as part of reforms to the schemes in the mid-2000s. In general, these changes were not made retrospective. A limited exception has been made for some survivors of members of the armed forces in recognition of the fact that the unique nature of service life places them at a particular disadvantage in building up entitlement to an occupational pension in their own right. 


    2.2 Teachers

    In June 2006, the Department for Education and Skills issued proposals for reform of the Teachers’ Pension Scheme. This included a proposal for survivors’ pensions to be paid for life. This would apply both to new entrants from 1 January 2007 and for existing members on that date.12 The change was legislated for in the Teachers’ Pensions etc (Reform Amendments) regulations 2006 (SI 2006 No. 3122). However, it did not apply where the scheme member retired before 1 January 2007. 

    The OP's father retired in 2001.

  • Tommyjw
    Tommyjw Posts: 237 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Why not call just up tomorrow morning and possibly have it sorted immediately 
  • Yorkie1
    Yorkie1 Posts: 11,909 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    What happened when she asked TPS why the payments had stopped?
    Letter to be posted tomorrow - we'll then see what their reply is. I'm just trying to get ahead of myself!
  • Yorkie1
    Yorkie1 Posts: 11,909 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Tommyjw said:
    Why not call just up tomorrow morning and possibly have it sorted immediately 
    After an inordinate length of time on hold, we gave up ... hence the letter being posted tomorrow!

  • Silvertabby
    Silvertabby Posts: 9,936 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 29 October 2023 at 11:15PM
    Were they married? If they were her pension should be for life regardless is she remarried or not. 
    Unfortunately, it would appear not in this case.  My understanding is that a TPS widow's pension only remains in payment after re-marriage/co-habitation if the scheme member had pensionable service after 1 Jan 2007.
    So, TPS not receiving confirmation that OP's mum was still eligible would certainly have resulted in the stoppage of payments - but I would have expected TPS to have followed that up with an investigation and recovery of any overpaid benefits.
    Yes, assuming that OP's mum remains eligible, the pension should be re-instated and full arrears paid. 
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 349.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453K Spending & Discounts
  • 242.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 619.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.4K Life & Family
  • 255.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.