We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Permanently removing the chimney pipes

Hi,
I see that some of my neighbours don't have the chimney pipes anymore, so I definitely want do be in the same lucky situation.
I prefer to permanently remove them rather than closing them, because I don't want to have any source of water leaking in the house.

I'll ask a tradesman a quote and a detailed description of the work, but what does the removal entail?
How would the space be filled? Brickwork or what else?
Do I need planning permission from the Council?
Is there anything in particular that I need to make sure of?

Thanks.
«13

Comments

  • ThisIsWeird
    ThisIsWeird Posts: 7,935 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    Pipes or pots?
  • Pots.      
  • Any work involving chimney I think is subject to Party Wall Act unless your house is detached.
  • It's terraced.
    I think that the neighbour is willing to do the same, but I'll surely ask him
  • stuart45
    stuart45 Posts: 5,252 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Are you going to ventilate them? Rain can find it's way inside through the brickwork, as well as from the top. 
  • I don't really know how this kind of work should be done, that's why I asked in this forum.
    So they should be ventilated? How? From the top or from the sides or from somewhere else? 
    Wouldn't water leak inside?
  • stuart45
    stuart45 Posts: 5,252 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    You can get one of these for the pots. Unused flues are better being ventilated.

  • pieroabcd
    pieroabcd Posts: 738 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 500 Posts Name Dropper
    That would mean capping, but I want to remove the pots instead
  • FreeBear
    FreeBear Posts: 18,518 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    pieroabcd said:
    That would mean capping, but I want to remove the pots instead
    Unless you plan on removing the chimney breasts and stack all the way, I'd suggest leaving the pots and just capping them. Caps will stop water getting in, and the next owner might want to install a stove.
    Personal opinion, but a stack without a pot looks silly on a building.

    Any language construct that forces such insanity in this case should be abandoned without regrets. –
    Erik Aronesty, 2014

    Treasure the moments that you have. Savour them for as long as you can for they will never come back again.
  • stuart45
    stuart45 Posts: 5,252 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    If you're dead set on removing the pots, the flaunching needs knocking off, something like slates over the flue, and new flaunching on top. You could get an air brick into the brickwork.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.6K Life & Family
  • 262.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.