We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Will Problems
Options
Comments
-
Hi,
If the house is jointly owned then he can leave his share of the house however he wishes, he does not need his wife's permission to do so.
if the house is owned as Joint Tenants then he needs to sever the joint tenancy to do that, but he can do that without his wife's permission (but he is required to let her know he has done so).
If you are not passing your half onto your spouse (e.g. you are passing it to children) then it is usual to give your spouse a life interest in your half of the house to prevent the people you have bequeathed it to throwing them out of it (achieved by a trust created by the will).0 -
DrDeejUK said:RAS said:If it was a joint tenancy, then your step-father can sever the tenancy (make it tenants in common) unilaterally, but he has to inform your mother.
If he hasn't severed the tenancy, then even if he leaves half the house to the children, it makes no difference because he doesn't have half to leave. We've seen that happen here before.
So, let me get this right. If my mother doesn't agree to sign her half of the house back to him then whatever provisions and trusts he has set up in his new will are meaningless. Is that correct?0 -
DrDeejUK said:RAS said:If it was a joint tenancy, then your step-father can sever the tenancy (make it tenants in common) unilaterally, but he has to inform your mother.
If he hasn't severed the tenancy, then even if he leaves half the house to the children, it makes no difference because he doesn't have half to leave. We've seen that happen here before.
So, let me get this right. If my mother doesn't agree to sign her half of the house back to him then whatever provisions and trusts he has set up in his new will are meaningless. Is that correct?
After the joint tenancy is severed Mum and step father would normally own half the house each. Step father's will can only specify what happens to his half of the house. Mum's agreement is not required. Mum's will specifies what happens to her half.
If the joint tenancy is not severed step father's will cannot specify anything about what happens to the house1 -
DrDeejUK said:Flugelhorn said:DrDeejUK said:Flugelhorn said:If your mother survives him then you read no further than (2a) ie she gets all the property and is executrix. The other factors only come into play if your mother had predeceased him
Have you checked how they own the property ? is it joint or tenants in common?
You are probably right but I've been told if my mother dies after him then I get everything and the other siblings get nothing. That doesn't sound right to me. As far as current ownership goes the property is in joint names (my step-dad and my mother).
Well, from what I understand now the house is being put into a trust for the children so I'm not sure how that changes things.Googling on your question might have been both quicker and easier, if you're only after simple facts rather than opinions!1 -
DrDeejUK said:RAS said:If it was a joint tenancy, then your step-father can sever the tenancy (make it tenants in common) unilaterally, but he has to inform your mother.
If he hasn't severed the tenancy, then even if he leaves half the house to the children, it makes no difference because he doesn't have half to leave. We've seen that happen here before.
So, let me get this right. If my mother doesn't agree to sign her half of the house back to him then whatever provisions and trusts he has set up in his new will are meaningless. Is that correct?
In England and Wales, there are two ways to own a house jointly. You need to know which. Costs £3 to find out from the Land Registry.
A joint tenancy means that both parties own 100% of the property and when one dies, the survivor still owns 100%. You can't leave 0% of a house to anyone although there have been at least a couple of attempts to do so reported on MSE that I know of.
Tenants in common means both parties own an agreed portion of the house and can leave that to whoever they wish. That can cause problems if it's left to anyone other than the other owner. The new joint owner(s) might want to sell, and could do eventually, leaving the survivor in difficulties. By putting it in life interest trust, for the use of the survivor, it protects the survivor because the trust own the other half, and protects the future beneficiaries from complications re CGT, benefits, First time buyer status and second home charges.
If someone is in joint tenancy, they can sever the tenancy without the other owners consent, but they need to tell the other owner. The assumed portions are 50:50.
From a practical point of view it also prevents the survivor making, or marrying and failing to make, a new will, which could exclude any of the original beneficiaries of the first deceased getting anything when the survivor dies.If you've have not made a mistake, you've made nothing1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 257.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards