IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including QR codes, number plates and reference numbers.
19 mins to purchase a ticket.

ws8219
Forumite Posts: 5
Newbie

Is this how it plays out?
Entered car park at 09:09 - purchased a ticket at 09:28. I received a phone call when parked up, hence the delay.
Left within the allotted time.
PCN issued - NTK - Charge £100 / £60.
Appeal - Expect to be rejected.
Second appeal - Expect to be rejected.
Ignore all letters.
It gets dropped or ends up in court.
Go to court & explain to the judge that the delay in buying a ticket was because I was on an important phone call and that the "invoice" from the parking company is disproportionate to the alleged offence.
Judge rules against the parking company?
Entered car park at 09:09 - purchased a ticket at 09:28. I received a phone call when parked up, hence the delay.
Left within the allotted time.
PCN issued - NTK - Charge £100 / £60.
Appeal - Expect to be rejected.
Second appeal - Expect to be rejected.
Ignore all letters.
It gets dropped or ends up in court.
Go to court & explain to the judge that the delay in buying a ticket was because I was on an important phone call and that the "invoice" from the parking company is disproportionate to the alleged offence.
Judge rules against the parking company?
0
Comments
-
I'm at the PCN stage.
0 -
Which PPC? Some are easy.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top of this/any page where it says:
Forum Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD0 -
Excel Parking0
-
OK so they might sue you. This is NOT how to argue it:Go to court & explain to the judge that the delay in buying a ticket was because I was on an important phone call and that the "invoice" from the parking company is disproportionate to the alleged offence.
Certainly DO NOT mention taking a phone call in your appeal!
PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top of this/any page where it says:
Forum Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD3 -
"...the delay in buying a ticket was because I was on an important phone call and that the "invoice" from the parking company is disproportionate to the alleged offence."
The above is a classic example of how to shoot yourself in both feet.
The difference between intelligence and stupidity is... intelligence has its limits.4 -
Unfortunately, I coughed up. Not prepared to go to court over £60.
Technically I did break their terms regardless of how unfair it seems.
Lesson learned and move on.0 -
ws8219 said:Unfortunately, I coughed up. Not prepared to go to court over £60.
Technically I did break their terms regardless of how unfair it seems.
Lesson learned and move on.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2713705/amp/The-parking-ticket-fat-cats-one-s-chum-Prezza-two-drive-Aston-Martins-Meet-men-ve-millions-motorists-misery.htmlDon't worry. Your case has taken money from you but some good people are taking action.
The regulars here are fighting and succeeding in changing the law to protect people like you. The applicable law is changing in 2024 thanks largely to us, good people on motoring groups and robust MPs who smell a rat when it's in front of them.
Over 5 years of hard work is finally working.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top of this/any page where it says:
Forum Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD3 -
Pay a scammer, you are then marked as a 'mug" for future reference.The difference between intelligence and stupidity is... intelligence has its limits.1
-
How could I possibly win if it went to court?
I broke the terms, and after reading on here and Pepipoo it seems that Excel rarely back down
Although I since checked my email and this appeal worked for me in 2017 against Highview. Not sure if it is still relevant.
"I am appealing as the keeper and ONLY Schedule 4 of the POFA (or evidence of who was driving) can cause a keeper appellant to be deemed to be the liable party. The PCN makes no attempt to pass liability to the keeper after 28 days. A vehicle can be driven by any person (with the consent of the owner) as long as the driver is insured.
There is no dispute that the driver was entitled to drive the car and I can confirm that they were, but I am exercising my right not to name that person. As the keeper of the vehicle, it is my right to choose not to name the driver, yet still not be lawfully held liable if an operator is not using or complying with Schedule 4.
This exact finding was made in 6061796103 against ParkingEye in September 2016, where POPLA Assessor Carly Law found: ''I note the operator advises that it is not attempting to transfer the liability for the charge using the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 and so in mind, the operator continues to hold the driver responsible. As such, I must first consider whether I am confident that I know who the driver is, based on the evidence received. After considering the evidence, I am unable to confirm that the appellant is in fact the driver. As such, I must allow the appeal on the basis that the operator has failed to demonstrate that the appellant is the driver and therefore liable for the charge. As I am allowing the appeal on this basis, I do not need to consider the other grounds of appeal raised by the appellant. Accordingly, I must allow this appeal.''
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 338.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 248.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 447.6K Spending & Discounts
- 230.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 171.1K Life & Family
- 244K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards