We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Claim form received for alleged offence over 4 yrs ago
Jjsnowdog
Posts: 11 Forumite
Hello any advise greatly received
i received a parking charge though the post 4 years ago
it was for a old company car and numerous people had access throughout the day/week. The letter via Bw legal and napier parking arrived numerous months later. Previous advise and communication helped me to formulate a response. After 4 months with no reply a second letter (same as previous) arrived. With help again i formulated the response below
26/6/20
To whom it may concern
Regarding a Letter of Claim delivered by yourselves for the collection of £150.00 on behalf of Napier Parking Limited and additions of initial legal costs, estimated court fees and estimated solicitors cost outlined by your last letter (totalling £229.18)
As stated in my previous correspondence concerned with this alleged contravention, I am denying the debt as the company vehicle in question was utilized by multiple drivers at any one time and no one is able to remember this alleged contravention on the unremarkable day.
As explained in 2 separate previous replies I would like to make clear your client has failed to meet POFA2012 schedule 4 paragraph 9, 13 and 14 requirements to hold the keeper liable for this alleged debt.
I am again writing to you to deny the debt as I have never been liable as no notice to hirer was ever served on myself and if it was did not include the mandatory enclosures under POFA Schedule 4Paragraph 13/14. If your client disagrees with this in the interests of open dealing and the overriding objectives of the court please provide proof, they complied with POFA2012 schedule 4 Paragraph 9, 13, 14. Please provide this within 14 days.
Previous correspondence included this request and still I am waiting for the proof/documentation originally asked for on the 11th February 2020
I then have heard nothing for 3 years until a claim form from civil national business centre arrived with the revised amounts of
amount claimed : 357.84
court fee :50
legal representative fee : 50
total amount : 457.84
ive read the claims form and understand to answer with 14 Days which i will - is there anything else needed at this stage ? I have previously sent a SAR request to Napier in 2020 for the document which they have sent (although i didn't receive 60% of the letters they claim to have posted )
thanks
i received a parking charge though the post 4 years ago
it was for a old company car and numerous people had access throughout the day/week. The letter via Bw legal and napier parking arrived numerous months later. Previous advise and communication helped me to formulate a response. After 4 months with no reply a second letter (same as previous) arrived. With help again i formulated the response below
26/6/20
To whom it may concern
Regarding a Letter of Claim delivered by yourselves for the collection of £150.00 on behalf of Napier Parking Limited and additions of initial legal costs, estimated court fees and estimated solicitors cost outlined by your last letter (totalling £229.18)
As stated in my previous correspondence concerned with this alleged contravention, I am denying the debt as the company vehicle in question was utilized by multiple drivers at any one time and no one is able to remember this alleged contravention on the unremarkable day.
As explained in 2 separate previous replies I would like to make clear your client has failed to meet POFA2012 schedule 4 paragraph 9, 13 and 14 requirements to hold the keeper liable for this alleged debt.
I am again writing to you to deny the debt as I have never been liable as no notice to hirer was ever served on myself and if it was did not include the mandatory enclosures under POFA Schedule 4Paragraph 13/14. If your client disagrees with this in the interests of open dealing and the overriding objectives of the court please provide proof, they complied with POFA2012 schedule 4 Paragraph 9, 13, 14. Please provide this within 14 days.
Previous correspondence included this request and still I am waiting for the proof/documentation originally asked for on the 11th February 2020
I then have heard nothing for 3 years until a claim form from civil national business centre arrived with the revised amounts of
amount claimed : 357.84
court fee :50
legal representative fee : 50
total amount : 457.84
ive read the claims form and understand to answer with 14 Days which i will - is there anything else needed at this stage ? I have previously sent a SAR request to Napier in 2020 for the document which they have sent (although i didn't receive 60% of the letters they claim to have posted )
thanks
0
Comments
-
Hello and welcome.
What is the Issue Date on your Claim Form?1 -
Just for reference, advice is what you received.Jjsnowdog said:Hello any advise greatly received
i received a parking charge though the post 4 years ago
it was for a old company car and numerous people had access throughout the day/week. The letter via Bw legal and napier parking arrived numerous months later. Previous advise and communication helped me to1 -
I then have heard nothing for 3 years until a claim form from civil national business centre arrived with the revised amounts of
amount claimed : 357.84total amount : 457.84Pretty high.
Do the Particulars of Claim on the left, list two PCNs?PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD0 -
Previous correspondence included this request and still I am waiting for the proof/documentation originally asked for on the 11th February 2020
Court judges are non too impressed with ignorance and incompetence
Far too late for BWLegal to respond
I had a case with BWLegal where they were asked questions which they ignored. This was shown to the judge who questioned the "rent by the hour" legal rep ....... he had no clue .... case dismissed and £90 costs awarded
Sounds like BWLegal want a repeat0 -
Thanks for the responses
please see claim form received
[Image removed by moderation team]0 -
Issue date is 21st Aug
POC show 2 fixed charge notices0 -
You have left your claim number and password visible; this needs taking down and redacting!1
-
You've left the Claim Number and MCOL password clearly visible.
I wonder what a mischievous person might be able to do with that?With a Claim Issue Date of 21st August, you have until Monday 11th September to file an Acknowledgment of Service but there is nothing to be gained by delaying it.To file an Acknowledgment of Service, follow the guidance in the Dropbox file linked from the second post in the NEWBIES thread.Having filed an Acknowledgment of Service in a timely manner, you have until 4pm on Monday 25th September 2023 to file your Defence.That's well over three weeks away. Plenty of time to produce a Defence, but please don't leave it to the last minute.To create a Defence, and then file a Defence by email, look again at the second post on the NEWBIES thread - immediately following where you found the Acknowledgment of Service guidance.Don't miss the deadline for filing an Acknowledgment of Service, nor that for filing a Defence.
Do not try and file a Defence via the MoneyClaimOnline website. Once an Acknowledgment of Service has been filed, the MCOL website should be treated as 'read only'.1 -
Yes two tickets @ £100 each = £200 .... they claim £237.84 ??Jjsnowdog said:Issue date is 21st Aug
POC show 2 fixed charge notices
They claim £120 for recovery ? They say this is set out in the ATA code of practice. This is just a form of double recovery which the courts do NOT allow and as the ATA is unregulated, there is no legal authority to add a fake amount of £120. BWLegal has never explained what their legal authority is and they never will ..... DOUBLE RECOVERY
Court fees for a claim up to £300 is £35. By adding a fake £120 means their claim before interest means it falls into the next category of fee £300 - £1500 which is £50
Leaving out the fake £120 and including the interest of £57.84, the total claim should be £257.84 and a court fee of £35
According to them two tickets = £237.84 PLUS A FAKE £120.00
Their cliam before the court fee and solicitor costs = £357,84
WHERE DOES £237.84 COME FROM ?
They claim interest of £57.84 based on 8% but that is not included in the amount claimed. Nobody nowadays receives 8% and most judges will not allow this as most judges will not allow the fake £120
The claim should be ..
£200 + £35 + £50 = £285 .... AND NOT THE INFLATED AMOUNT OF £457.84
Do you have a picture of the sign0 -
Claim form attached
[image removed by moderation team]0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards


