We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

A Quandary...

Options
2»

Comments

  • BooJewels
    BooJewels Posts: 3,006 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    LHW99 said:
    Good feelings are nice, but having 3 years left to go on a fix probably means there will be a penalty for early repayment. May not be much, but if there's no need to pay it, I (personally) wouldn't.
    I would certainly do as suggested above and put £17k into a 3-year fix, so there's no temptation to spend what you need to use in future to pay off the mortgage.
    The point I was eluding to was perhaps the reason for a critical illness pay out precludes longer term plans being as appropriate as they might otherwise be.  In normal circumstances, a 3 year fix at five times the interest rate of a fixed mortgage would be a no brainer - if your ability to work and future income etc. was predictable.  My husband only lived 18 months after getting his critical illness payment - so that might have left me with a mess to sort out and Probate to apply for etc.  Only the OP knows what their immediate future holds in that respect - which must be a factor in their decision making.
  • jimjames
    jimjames Posts: 18,635 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    BooJewels said:
     Plus, our mortgage payments had been a significant part of our monthly outgoings and that in turn meant when he wasn't sure he wanted to continue with full time work, we could afford for him to go part time, as our expenses were pretty much halved without the mortgage payments.  Then when he wasn't really well enough to work, it meant we could manage on the benefits he then qualified for - it would have been very difficult with the mortgage still in place.
    Sorry to hear about your husband but with the mortgage in place and the savings to cover paying it off in one go but used monthly instead would have been exactly the same situation as paying it off completely. The benefit would be the much higher interest payments you earn plus not paying the ERC on the mortgage so I don't see how that decision about working would have been difficult.
    Remember the saying: if it looks too good to be true it almost certainly is.
  • BooJewels
    BooJewels Posts: 3,006 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    jimjames said:
    BooJewels said:
     Plus, our mortgage payments had been a significant part of our monthly outgoings and that in turn meant when he wasn't sure he wanted to continue with full time work, we could afford for him to go part time, as our expenses were pretty much halved without the mortgage payments.  Then when he wasn't really well enough to work, it meant we could manage on the benefits he then qualified for - it would have been very difficult with the mortgage still in place.
    Sorry to hear about your husband but with the mortgage in place and the savings to cover paying it off in one go but used monthly instead would have been exactly the same situation as paying it off completely. The benefit would be the much higher interest payments you earn plus not paying the ERC on the mortgage so I don't see how that decision about working would have been difficult.
    It was 3 years ago, so interest rates weren't what they are now - I think the mortgage was 4.7% and savings earned a bit under 2%. Plus, our mortgage payments were disproportionately high after a snaffoo by the lender and an endowment shortfall.  A quick tot up would suggest that monthly we'd have earned about 10% of the mortgage repayments in interest. Plus, I already said the ERCs were waived because the mortgage was repaid by a critical illness settlement. They then reimbursed the insurance payments back to the day we requested the forms (it had all taken some time to settle) and the interest we'd paid since the same date.   As we'd taken level term insurance, we did still have about half of the lump sum to supplement our income.

    I'm sorry that you feel it necessary to question what I'd posted and that you 'can't see' why we took that decision.  Maybe in today's market, it might well be different.  If nothing else, it gave my husband enormous comfort to know we'd secured my future home, when everything else was so uncertain.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.8K Life & Family
  • 257.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.