We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Actions before small claims court with council
Options
Comments
-
Dave_5150 said:Telling your insurer is covered in "the need to knows" in the same pothole guide you obtained the letter template from:
https://www.moneysavingexpert.com/reclaim/pothole-claims/
tl;dr "Insurers tell us drivers should notify them of pothole damage immediately, regardless of whether they intend to claim"
0 -
MacPingu1986 said:Ectophile said:I have to say that this forum is plagued by naysayers who will tell you that you can never win against any big company or government organisation. Ever. You will always lose and end up paying them huge fortunes in legal fees.In reality, I don't know how a judge will rule in a specific case, and they don't know either.The council's legal team may decide that they haven't followed their own rules, give in and pay you before it gets to court. Or not.The judge might blame you for hitting a stationary pothole. Or blame the council for failings in their procedures. The council's main defence against negligence claims is that they have procedures against damaging potholes, and that they followed them. if they didn't follow them, their defence is much weaker.
The council might well decide they've completely messed up and pay out. What has been warned is that *most* pothole claims fail (c75% on average), and if the claim isn't allocated to the small claims track, there are cost implications. These aren't enormous, but risking a potential costs bill from an unsuccessful claim of even say £500-1500 needs to put into context of the overall low claim amount as to whether the claim is worth it.
I have said I would crowdfund any money for potential legal fees, if not spent they will be returned to donors or to road safety charities etc. There's a lot of support in the community for this potential case as the pothole has had numerous victims.
If it becomes blindingly obvious any fees would dwarf the money sought then that will change things but it's difficult to tell I'm getting conflicting advice.0 -
i watched your video and there is no way the o/s would have sustained that amount of damage to need replacing
0 -
tedted said:i watched your video and there is no way the o/s would have sustained that amount of damage to need replacing
Clearly it did .
There was no damage to the car prior to the incident
It had an MOT literally three months to the day of the accident and passed. Advisories were not related to the shock absorbers and suspension links.
The council claim that is a 3 inch pothole. I have never driven over any pothole within that effect
After I hit the hole rattling sounds I began to notice and based on that I took the car in for repair and they found the defects
An extra exhaust pipe had also become lose which was removed as extra it didn't need replacing.
Other road users have reported damaged wheels and rims and cars being beached on their sills presumably driving at faster speeds than I was.0 -
o/s front and if the garage found these defects they ripped you off
0 -
tedted said:o/s front and if the garage found these defects they ripped you off
You can quite clearly hear a crunch in the video0 -
Resend the letter giving them a 7 day deadline. Individuals need 30 days but businesses only need 7-14 days0
-
1990xrider said:Dave_5150 said:Telling your insurer is covered in "the need to knows" in the same pothole guide you obtained the letter template from:
https://www.moneysavingexpert.com/reclaim/pothole-claims/
tl;dr "Insurers tell us drivers should notify them of pothole damage immediately, regardless of whether they intend to claim"
Before renewal You must tell us about any incident or motoring offence that’s happened since your cover started. For example, if anyone covered by the policy has had: > Any motoring convictions, endorsements, penalty points, fixed penalties (excluding parking penalties), speed camera offences or disqualifications. > Any incidents, thefts or losses, even if they didn’t claim or were not to blame. > Any insurance cancelled by another insurer for fraud or misrepresentation.
Note Any incidents, thefts or losses, even if they didn’t claim or were not to blame. >0 -
sheramber said:1990xrider said:Dave_5150 said:Telling your insurer is covered in "the need to knows" in the same pothole guide you obtained the letter template from:
https://www.moneysavingexpert.com/reclaim/pothole-claims/
tl;dr "Insurers tell us drivers should notify them of pothole damage immediately, regardless of whether they intend to claim"
Before renewal You must tell us about any incident or motoring offence that’s happened since your cover started. For example, if anyone covered by the policy has had: > Any motoring convictions, endorsements, penalty points, fixed penalties (excluding parking penalties), speed camera offences or disqualifications. > Any incidents, thefts or losses, even if they didn’t claim or were not to blame. > Any insurance cancelled by another insurer for fraud or misrepresentation.
Note Any incidents, thefts or losses, even if they didn’t claim or were not to blame. >0 -
Car_54 said:sheramber said:1990xrider said:Dave_5150 said:Telling your insurer is covered in "the need to knows" in the same pothole guide you obtained the letter template from:
https://www.moneysavingexpert.com/reclaim/pothole-claims/
tl;dr "Insurers tell us drivers should notify them of pothole damage immediately, regardless of whether they intend to claim"
Before renewal You must tell us about any incident or motoring offence that’s happened since your cover started. For example, if anyone covered by the policy has had: > Any motoring convictions, endorsements, penalty points, fixed penalties (excluding parking penalties), speed camera offences or disqualifications. > Any incidents, thefts or losses, even if they didn’t claim or were not to blame. > Any insurance cancelled by another insurer for fraud or misrepresentation.
Note Any incidents, thefts or losses, even if they didn’t claim or were not to blame. >
"You must tell us before the next renewal date(or at the time you are making any of the changesalready mentioned) if you or anyone covered bythis policy have:• had insurance cancelled by an insurer. Thisincludes a policy declared null and void asthough it has never existed, a renewal declinedby an insurer or a policy cancelled by an insurerdue to, but not restricted to, non-payment,fraud or misrepresentation;• had any accidents, thefts or losses (whethera claim was reported or not and regardlessof blame);• had any motoring offences includingconvictions, endorsements, penalty points, fixedpenalties (excluding parking penalties), speedcamera offences, disqualifications or criminalprosecutions pending.Failure to provide correct information or inform usof any changes could adversely affect your policy,including invalidating your policy or claims beingrejected or not fully paid"0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards