PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING
Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.Renegotiating follow survey and EICR

MumInAFix
Forumite Posts: 1 Newbie
Hello! Complete newbie here.
I'm buying a house following divorce, offer is accepted and sale progressing. Since I put in my offer various surveys have highlighted issues and the seller has indicated they are willing to renegotiate - I want to be fair, but I also need to do the house up (it's in a 1980s condition - think avocado bathrooms etc). I had budgeting for updating but the additional repairs are adding up! These are my reasons for price negotiation:
- offer was accepted at 335k, mortgage company values at 327k
- The survey identified wall ties and potential woodworm treatment required - estimated cost £2500
- EICR unsatisfactory more than 31 points, majority are c2 categorised. I've had 2 electricians quote and recommended full rewire at an average cost of £5000. Wiring appears to be a mix of original 1950s and some 1980s
- in addition to this there will be unexpected plaster/redecorating work due to rewire (I was just going to repaint/wallpaper myself to modernise)
- solicitor has highlighted about £500 worth of required indemnity policies due to location of conservatory to drains and no planning for utility room.
I'm happy to still proceed but what would be a fair price to ask them to come down to? My original offer was £327,500 - which would be in line with the mortgage company valuation, but they wanted more hence offer of 335k. I'm thinking maybe of going back with 329,000 and maybe settle on 330k?
Am I being unfair or would that seem about right? It's probably worth saying that the house was originally on for 350k but that was way overvalued I'd say based on other properties I looked at similar - eg 325k with garage and drive which this does not have and in better order. I like the house and I'm not trying to be a bad buyer, but this is make or break for me pulling out - which I don't want to do.
I'm buying a house following divorce, offer is accepted and sale progressing. Since I put in my offer various surveys have highlighted issues and the seller has indicated they are willing to renegotiate - I want to be fair, but I also need to do the house up (it's in a 1980s condition - think avocado bathrooms etc). I had budgeting for updating but the additional repairs are adding up! These are my reasons for price negotiation:
- offer was accepted at 335k, mortgage company values at 327k
- The survey identified wall ties and potential woodworm treatment required - estimated cost £2500
- EICR unsatisfactory more than 31 points, majority are c2 categorised. I've had 2 electricians quote and recommended full rewire at an average cost of £5000. Wiring appears to be a mix of original 1950s and some 1980s
- in addition to this there will be unexpected plaster/redecorating work due to rewire (I was just going to repaint/wallpaper myself to modernise)
- solicitor has highlighted about £500 worth of required indemnity policies due to location of conservatory to drains and no planning for utility room.
I'm happy to still proceed but what would be a fair price to ask them to come down to? My original offer was £327,500 - which would be in line with the mortgage company valuation, but they wanted more hence offer of 335k. I'm thinking maybe of going back with 329,000 and maybe settle on 330k?
Am I being unfair or would that seem about right? It's probably worth saying that the house was originally on for 350k but that was way overvalued I'd say based on other properties I looked at similar - eg 325k with garage and drive which this does not have and in better order. I like the house and I'm not trying to be a bad buyer, but this is make or break for me pulling out - which I don't want to do.
0
Comments
-
You've bought a house that everyone knew from the start needed refurbishment.
You're now wanting to renegotiate the purchase price because you will need to spend money on refurbishment.
It would have been obvious (or very easy to work out) that the wiring was old, so that should already be in the original price, and there is only a "potential" need for woodworm treatment, so asking for money off because you might need to do something in future is a bit keen.
The only thing that I can see that might actually be grounds is the need for wall ties. What's the price of that bit of work by itself?
The seller should buy the indemnity policies, not you.
No doubt others will turn up to say you should ask for £50k off, but I think it should be almost no negotiation needed.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 338.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 248.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 447.6K Spending & Discounts
- 230.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 171.1K Life & Family
- 244K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards