PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Shared ownership flat - renovation questions

Options
2»

Comments

  • eddddy
    eddddy Posts: 18,021 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    christmaslights said:

    I guess it depends on what you consider to be ‘alterations’.  You could argue that painting the walls or replacing an internal door, or doing something essential such as replacing a broken boiler is an alteration, but if you had to list this sort of thing in the tiny box provided for such detail on the form you’d soon run out of room!  

    I agree that the situation depends entirely on the wording of the lease.

    But saying that "the box on the form was too small" wouldn't be a defence - you could add a separate sheet of paper.


    Realistically, the issue is the mindset of the buyer.
    • If you show a buyer a letter of consent (or a letter confirming that consent is not required) - I guess any buyer would be completely happy with that
    • If you say to a buyer (or their solicitor) that you don't have consent, because you don't think consent is required - that might make some buyers (or their solicitors) more nervous and/or they might disagree with you.


  • HampshireH
    HampshireH Posts: 4,944 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I'm really surprised to hear that developers are fitting wood flooring / laminate to new build flats.

    Being ground floor makes no difference in terms of leases clauses.

    Noise also travels upwards from ground floors so whilst nobody below you will be having an issues with heels on the floor or things being dropped etc those above you likely will unless that insulation is very good.

    As others have said your lease will specify whether you can or can't.

    For decoration some developers specify not to decorate in defects period or put things on the walls as they may deem any defects the owners responsibility and not action them.
     (Obviously a defect in the kitchen wouldn't be affected by you putting up shelves in a bedroom)
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.