We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

State Pension - will it eventually be means tested?

Options
12346

Comments

  • Silvertabby
    Silvertabby Posts: 10,116 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Eighth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    artyboy said:
    Pat38493 said:
    Any such changes would have to be made over an extremely long time period as people would need many years to plan for it (unless it was only targeted at ridiculously rich people in which case it wouldn't make a lot of difference in the grand scheme of things).
    I would expect (hope?) that the seriously rich don't bother claiming their State pensions.
    I find that view a bit odd, so you are expected to pay contributions towards something for many years, but then shouldn't take the benefit just because you don't really need it?

    Should the rich also be expected to give up their homes after they have finished paying off the mortgage? Maybe hand over their private pensions and other investments as they mature as well...
    No, of course not.  I mean multi-millionaires ( more of these in the UK than you'd think) to whom £10K is not worth the paperwork.
  • To some degree it already is.  If you have a Private Pension then you are not able to claim things that State Pensioners, on Pension Credit get, like housing benefit and free or cheap entry to say Hampton Court or Kew Gardens etc.  I’m sure those added extras add up to quite a bit if you claim them. I’m sure some people with Private Pensions just beyond the limit for PC are worse off.
    You can definitely get housing and council tax benefit with a full state pension and a works pensions 
    Depending upon savings 
    That was why I put “if you are just beyond the limit” for Pension Credit.  My entire SP pays for my rent now, 8 years ago when I opted to move where I live I had some spare money from it.  I now wonder why I worked for less money while I paid into the DB pension, I could possibly be better off getting my rent paid and other benefits that come with Pension Credit.  If I want to visit my local NT property I have to pay £14.50 or become a member, same goes for Kew Gardens, Tower of London, Hampton Court as examples, if I had PC it would cost £1. 
    Paddle No 21:wave:
  • zagfles
    zagfles Posts: 21,412 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Chutzpah Haggler
    To some degree it already is.  If you have a Private Pension then you are not able to claim things that State Pensioners, on Pension Credit get, like housing benefit and free or cheap entry to say Hampton Court or Kew Gardens etc.  I’m sure those added extras add up to quite a bit if you claim them. I’m sure some people with Private Pensions just beyond the limit for PC are worse off.
    You can definitely get housing and council tax benefit with a full state pension and a works pensions 
    Depending upon savings 
    That was why I put “if you are just beyond the limit” for Pension Credit.  My entire SP pays for my rent now, 8 years ago when I opted to move where I live I had some spare money from it.  I now wonder why I worked for less money while I paid into the DB pension, I could possibly be better off getting my rent paid and other benefits that come with Pension Credit.  If I want to visit my local NT property I have to pay £14.50 or become a member, same goes for Kew Gardens, Tower of London, Hampton Court as examples, if I had PC it would cost £1. 
    Housing benefit isn't cut off at a cliff edge, it's tapered at 65%, so if you're just over the limit HB will be reduced a bit, you don't suddenly lose it when you exceed the threshold. A higher income doesn't make you worse off because of HB, due to the taper you can only lose 65p of HB per extra £1 of income, so you're not worse off with a higher income. 
    Some other more minor benefits are cliff edge, but not HB.
  • artyboy
    artyboy Posts: 1,594 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    edited 15 July 2023 at 2:42PM
    artyboy said:
    Pat38493 said:
    Any such changes would have to be made over an extremely long time period as people would need many years to plan for it (unless it was only targeted at ridiculously rich people in which case it wouldn't make a lot of difference in the grand scheme of things).
    I would expect (hope?) that the seriously rich don't bother claiming their State pensions.
    I find that view a bit odd, so you are expected to pay contributions towards something for many years, but then shouldn't take the benefit just because you don't really need it?

    Should the rich also be expected to give up their homes after they have finished paying off the mortgage? Maybe hand over their private pensions and other investments as they mature as well...
    No, of course not.  I mean multi-millionaires ( more of these in the UK than you'd think) to whom £10K is not worth the paperwork.
    Well yes, Mrs Arty and myself for starters, once our private pensions and property are taken into account. 

    Frankly I'm not overly put off by the paperwork, especially given the levels of NI we've actually paid over the years and will continue to do so as long as we're working (and let's not forget that extra 2% uncapped bit), despite being fully paid up for SP, and also reducing our dependency on the NHS through our employers private health insurance - for which we get taxed extra as well.

    But perhaps we should just give up our SP for "the greater good"  :/

    Or did you have a specific figure/threshold for "obscene wealth" that I can sneak in below?
  • artyboy said:
    artyboy said:
    Pat38493 said:
    Any such changes would have to be made over an extremely long time period as people would need many years to plan for it (unless it was only targeted at ridiculously rich people in which case it wouldn't make a lot of difference in the grand scheme of things).
    I would expect (hope?) that the seriously rich don't bother claiming their State pensions.
    I find that view a bit odd, so you are expected to pay contributions towards something for many years, but then shouldn't take the benefit just because you don't really need it?

    Should the rich also be expected to give up their homes after they have finished paying off the mortgage? Maybe hand over their private pensions and other investments as they mature as well...
    No, of course not.  I mean multi-millionaires ( more of these in the UK than you'd think) to whom £10K is not worth the paperwork.
    Well yes, Mrs Arty and myself for starters, once our private pensions and property are taken into account. 

    Frankly I'm not overly put off by the paperwork, especially given the levels of NI we've actually paid over the years and will continue to do so as long as we're working (and let's not forget that extra 2% uncapped bit), despite being fully paid up for SP, and also reducing our dependency on the NHS through our employers private health insurance - for which we get taxed extra as well.

    But perhaps we should just give up our SP for "the greater good"  :/

    Or did you have a specific figure/threshold for "obscene wealth" that I can sneak in below?
    £20m net wealth
  • artyboy
    artyboy Posts: 1,594 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    artyboy said:
    artyboy said:
    Pat38493 said:
    Any such changes would have to be made over an extremely long time period as people would need many years to plan for it (unless it was only targeted at ridiculously rich people in which case it wouldn't make a lot of difference in the grand scheme of things).
    I would expect (hope?) that the seriously rich don't bother claiming their State pensions.
    I find that view a bit odd, so you are expected to pay contributions towards something for many years, but then shouldn't take the benefit just because you don't really need it?

    Should the rich also be expected to give up their homes after they have finished paying off the mortgage? Maybe hand over their private pensions and other investments as they mature as well...
    No, of course not.  I mean multi-millionaires ( more of these in the UK than you'd think) to whom £10K is not worth the paperwork.
    Well yes, Mrs Arty and myself for starters, once our private pensions and property are taken into account. 

    Frankly I'm not overly put off by the paperwork, especially given the levels of NI we've actually paid over the years and will continue to do so as long as we're working (and let's not forget that extra 2% uncapped bit), despite being fully paid up for SP, and also reducing our dependency on the NHS through our employers private health insurance - for which we get taxed extra as well.

    But perhaps we should just give up our SP for "the greater good"  :/

    Or did you have a specific figure/threshold for "obscene wealth" that I can sneak in below?
    £20m net wealth
    Phew, that's me safe then to plunder the public purse  :D
  • nigelbb
    nigelbb Posts: 3,819 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    How on earth could the state pension be means tested? There are currently around twelve million people receiving a UK state pension with a million of those living abroad. How could overseas pensioners be means tested?
  • Silvertabby
    Silvertabby Posts: 10,116 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Eighth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    artyboy said:
    artyboy said:
    Pat38493 said:
    Any such changes would have to be made over an extremely long time period as people would need many years to plan for it (unless it was only targeted at ridiculously rich people in which case it wouldn't make a lot of difference in the grand scheme of things).
    I would expect (hope?) that the seriously rich don't bother claiming their State pensions.
    I find that view a bit odd, so you are expected to pay contributions towards something for many years, but then shouldn't take the benefit just because you don't really need it?

    Should the rich also be expected to give up their homes after they have finished paying off the mortgage? Maybe hand over their private pensions and other investments as they mature as well...
    No, of course not.  I mean multi-millionaires ( more of these in the UK than you'd think) to whom £10K is not worth the paperwork.
    Well yes, Mrs Arty and myself for starters, once our private pensions and property are taken into account. 

    Frankly I'm not overly put off by the paperwork, especially given the levels of NI we've actually paid over the years and will continue to do so as long as we're working (and let's not forget that extra 2% uncapped bit), despite being fully paid up for SP, and also reducing our dependency on the NHS through our employers private health insurance - for which we get taxed extra as well.

    But perhaps we should just give up our SP for "the greater good"  :/

    Or did you have a specific figure/threshold for "obscene wealth" that I can sneak in below?
    Don't worry - I'm thinking of riches way in excess of yours!  Millionaire (on paper) families are 10 a penny, (value of property, pensions, etc) but for whom the State pension is an essential element of their retirement plans.  After all, a pensioner on just the State pension, living in a house in London that they bought decades ago, could well be a paper millionaire.

    No, I mean the REAL rich.  £20m has already been mentioned, and unless this is all tied up in the value of an ancient family pile, then they may think that their time is more valuable than filling out the forms for 'just' £10K per year.
  • Flugelhorn
    Flugelhorn Posts: 7,306 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    nigelbb said:
    How on earth could the state pension be means tested? There are currently around twelve million people receiving a UK state pension with a million of those living abroad. How could overseas pensioners be means tested?
    they won't means test it any more than it already is means tested ie the more you earn, the more you pay into the system and then when you get the pension, the more you pay out in tax
  • nigelbb
    nigelbb Posts: 3,819 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    nigelbb said:
    How on earth could the state pension be means tested? There are currently around twelve million people receiving a UK state pension with a million of those living abroad. How could overseas pensioners be means tested?
    they won't means test it any more than it already is means tested ie the more you earn, the more you pay into the system and then when you get the pension, the more you pay out in tax
    Not necessarily. You can move abroad after contributing & paying tax in the UK for just three years then pay Class 2 National Insurance contributions for the next thirty odd years & receive a full UK state pension of around £10,600 per year for the outlay of under £6,000. If you are living abroad while receiving a UK state pension the tax you pay on it will be in country where you live not the UK.

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.