We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
Estate agent fees in London

sturgeon
Posts: 396 Forumite


I’m interested to know what fees you’ve been quoted and charged to sell a home in London. I’m being quoted 2% plus VAT for the leading agent in my area who sells the majority of properties to Hong Kong investors (the area I live in has a large community from china and Hong Kong). Some other agents were 1% plus VAT, Foxtons were 3% plus vat and refuse to negotiate.
The agent I’m speaking to has said they’ll look at an negotiation as I mentioned a sliding scale if they hit a minimum price but I’m planning to go back to ask to reduce the 2% to 1.7/1.75% if they don’t achieve the listing price. Anyone else done something like this, any suggestions?
0
Comments
-
1% plus vat is normal outside London. Don't see why London should be more when house prices are already higher. Everything ends up advertised in the same place anyway so not sure you will get much benefit from the expensive brands in practice.0
-
I’m in the suburbs near Hampstead and Highgate. I negotiated 1.25% plus vat, and I think I might have got down to 1%. This was for the leading agent in the area.
The thing is, though, they overvalued the house, and it hasn’t sold. I told them at the outset that they were asking too much, but they were so keen to get the house on their books… And other agents had valued even higher.
One thing I have learned is that a firm may be the leading agent in the area because they control the stock. That is they do whatever is necessary to get the property on their books. Then, they can rightly claim that they sell 90% of the property in their area, because no other agency has any stock to sell.
I am rather mean, and it bothers me to pay the agents say 2%, but if this means that they make an effort to sell the property that may be a good idea.No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?0 -
GDB2222 said:I’m in the suburbs near Hampstead and Highgate. I negotiated 1.25% plus vat, and I think I might have got down to 1%. This was for the leading agent in the area.
The thing is, though, they overvalued the house, and it hasn’t sold. I told them at the outset that they were asking too much, but they were so keen to get the house on their books… And other agents had valued even higher.
One thing I have learned is that a firm may be the leading agent in the area because they control the stock. That is they do whatever is necessary to get the property on their books. Then, they can rightly claim that they sell 90% of the property in their area, because no other agency has any stock to sell.
I am rather mean, and it bothers me to pay the agents say 2%, but if this means that they make an effort to sell the property that may be a good idea.
0 -
I agreed 1.5% if they got asking price and 1% if they didn’t.
0 -
anselld said:GDB2222 said:I’m in the suburbs near Hampstead and Highgate. I negotiated 1.25% plus vat, and I think I might have got down to 1%. This was for the leading agent in the area.
The thing is, though, they overvalued the house, and it hasn’t sold. I told them at the outset that they were asking too much, but they were so keen to get the house on their books… And other agents had valued even higher.
One thing I have learned is that a firm may be the leading agent in the area because they control the stock. That is they do whatever is necessary to get the property on their books. Then, they can rightly claim that they sell 90% of the property in their area, because no other agency has any stock to sell.
I am rather mean, and it bothers me to pay the agents say 2%, but if this means that they make an effort to sell the property that may be a good idea.No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 349.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 452.9K Spending & Discounts
- 242.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.3K Life & Family
- 255.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards