We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
SDLT, first time buyers relief and married couples

allconnected
Posts: 119 Forumite


Finding conflicting advice online so posting here for opinions.
A married couple live in a property owned solely by spouse A. Spouse B has never owned any property.
They are selling up and moving house, and are looking at whether making the onward purchase solely in Spouse B’s name will mean they qualify for first time buyers relief for stamp duty purposes.
A number of online guides by advisors say that having a spouse who has previously owned property excludes a buyer from first time buyers relief, even if they buy solely in their own name. However, I can’t find this exclusion anywhere in the actual SDLT rules, or in the definition of a first time buyer - the definition only appears to consider the situation of the purchasers, not any non-buying spouses.
Sooo.. are these articles all wrong - or if they are right, where in the first time buyer rules does having a spouse who has previously owned property exclude a purchaser from this relief?
(I know if the spouse still owns other property the higher rates will kick in and these do look at the property owning status of any spouse, but that isn’t the case here.)
opinions appreciated.
A married couple live in a property owned solely by spouse A. Spouse B has never owned any property.
They are selling up and moving house, and are looking at whether making the onward purchase solely in Spouse B’s name will mean they qualify for first time buyers relief for stamp duty purposes.
A number of online guides by advisors say that having a spouse who has previously owned property excludes a buyer from first time buyers relief, even if they buy solely in their own name. However, I can’t find this exclusion anywhere in the actual SDLT rules, or in the definition of a first time buyer - the definition only appears to consider the situation of the purchasers, not any non-buying spouses.
Sooo.. are these articles all wrong - or if they are right, where in the first time buyer rules does having a spouse who has previously owned property exclude a purchaser from this relief?
(I know if the spouse still owns other property the higher rates will kick in and these do look at the property owning status of any spouse, but that isn’t the case here.)
opinions appreciated.
0
Comments
-
allconnected said:Finding conflicting advice online so posting here for opinions.
A married couple live in a property owned solely by spouse A. Spouse B has never owned any property.
They are selling up and moving house, and are looking at whether making the onward purchase solely in Spouse B’s name will mean they qualify for first time buyers relief for stamp duty purposes.
A number of online guides by advisors say that having a spouse who has previously owned property excludes a buyer from first time buyers relief, even if they buy solely in their own name. However, I can’t find this exclusion anywhere in the actual SDLT rules, or in the definition of a first time buyer - the definition only appears to consider the situation of the purchasers, not any non-buying spouses.
Sooo.. are these articles all wrong - or if they are right, where in the first time buyer rules does having a spouse who has previously owned property exclude a purchaser from this relief?
(I know if the spouse still owns other property the higher rates will kick in and these do look at the property owning status of any spouse, but that isn’t the case here.)
opinions appreciated.
As you say, it is important to check the property owning position of the other spouse to check that the 3% surcharge override does not kick in.
There are rules for the 3% surcharge which make a spouse's property owning position relevant, but these are not replicated in the first time buyer relief rules (other than to the extent of the possible 3% surcharge override).
The point is confirmed in the guide here: https://www.blakemorgan.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/Downloads/Stamp-Duty-Land-Tax-First-Time-Buyers-Relief-29052019.pdf see section 6.1.1 -
Thank you - I’m surprised by how many guides to first time buyers relief make a blanket statement that spouses must both be first time buyers even if only one is purchasing, when this condition doesn’t appear anywhere in the rules.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 349.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 452.9K Spending & Discounts
- 242.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.3K Life & Family
- 255.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards