We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
New flats, guaranteed returns, no running costs: too good to be true?
Comments
-
Maybe because mini bonds have been banned by FCA the scammers have moved on to the next unregulated offersAlbermarle said:There seems to be a spate of similar offers recently. I saw one for 10% on student accommodation.
UK Student Accommodation Investment - 10% Net Return (ayanaproperties.com)
Seemed equally too good to be true.Remember the saying: if it looks too good to be true it almost certainly is.2 -
If it sounds too good to be true...
No such thing as "guaranteed income". Absolutely stinks. Sounds like a new variation of an investment fraud. In a past life, 9 out of 10 victims of such a fraud would usually have an inclination but ignore their gut feeling. Don't be one of them.2 -
I think this is probably scammy or at least overpromising returns, and the guarantees will be as useful as a chocolate teapot.
BUT if you look at the share CSH - Civitas Social Housing - seems to have been doing something similar in terms of owning a bunch of properties, renting them to DWP tenants, getting guaranteed rent. This was paying a 7.1p dividend and for most of the last 6 months the share price was between 52p-64p so the yield was >10% and 12-13% at times. Just over a week ago this company received a bid of 80p per share which is likely to go through (hence the jump in price on 9th May). This company was slightly leveraged, in that it borrowed some cash, but obviously all the running costs were taken out before profits calculated and dividends paid - the profits were more than the dividends.
So what I would say is that returns of 8-10% are not out of the realms of possibility.
Disclosure - I was a (tiny) shareholder of CSH in my ISA which is why I know this, but have no connection other than that.0 -
I would be asking where they got my email address.1
-
The difference is that any company guaranteeing 8-10% to an investor for 25 years is a scamcwep2 said:
So what I would say is that returns of 8-10% are not out of the realms of possibility.Remember the saying: if it looks too good to be true it almost certainly is.2 -
..I have joined, I hadn't got the money so I asked them to loan it to me and I will pay them back from the returns....
.."It's everybody's fault but mine...."3 -
1. Where did they get your name and email address?
2. If the returns are so good, there should be a Q trying hard to get a bit of the action! So why do they need to send emails to get investors?
3. The way I treat "door knockers" is to say "no thank you" and close the door in their face. The way to treat this type of email is, "If it looks to good to be true, ignore it".1 -
Thank you for your comments.
Here are further details from the investment company's website: https://knightknox.com/property/chapel-street/"That which does not kill you will hurt like hell", Friedrich Nietzche.0 -
Frog_Prince said:Thank you for your comments.
Here are further details from the investment company's website: https://knightknox.com/property/chapel-street/So they want £153,000 for a studio flat, in an area where the going rate for a one bed flat is less than half that? https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/124280990#/?channel=RES_BUYHell, for less than the price of 10 of their flats, you could buy 12 2-bed flats and a house, round the corner: https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/131835668#/?channel=RES_BUYIf they genuinely have an ironclad contract from a housing association paying £250 a week per studio flat, then that explains the elevated purchase price, but why do they?The maximum housing benefit allowance for Bradford for a 1-bed flat is £349 a month, not £250 a week.
4 -
Johnjdc said:Frog_Prince said:Thank you for your comments.
Here are further details from the investment company's website: https://knightknox.com/property/chapel-street/So they want £153,000 for a studio flat, in an area where the going rate for a one bed flat is less than half that? https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/124280990#/?channel=RES_BUYHell, for less than the price of 10 of their flats, you could buy 12 2-bed flats and a house, round the corner: https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/131835668#/?channel=RES_BUYIf they genuinely have an ironclad contract from a housing association paying £250 a week per studio flat, then that explains the elevated purchase price, but why do they?The maximum housing benefit allowance for Bradford for a 1-bed flat is £349 a month, not £250 a week.
Ah so it must be true then. The tenants will all hapily top up the housing benefit because they know the investor was guaranteed a grand a month.
Mr Generous - Landlord for more than 10 years. Generous? - Possibly but sarcastic more likely.1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards