We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
My offer was accepted below asking. Thoughts?
Comments
-
robatwork said:theartfullodger said:
Buying with tenants is entirely legal, OK, quite common. But even if, after purchase, you are outside in the car with 3 screaming kids, incontinent Rottweiler and emotionally collapsing partner plus removals van tenants have every right to remain.
As others have said - Snog Marry AVOID until it's vacant possession.
Oh and which one is crashy - sarah2 or warwick or both?2 -
How about this one, PropertyLog is showing 85k off so far?
I think with the OP`s budget they are going to get a bargain if they look around.
0 -
That is a 2-bedroom flat despite what the listing says. A store cupboard less than 4 foot wide isn't a bedroom.
If the seller hadn't decided to misleadingly list it then they wouldn't have had to reduce the price so much to get towards the price of other 2-beds.
3 -
Crashy is about half the users on this site now!
1 -
Jesus, I have seen people pushing it, but trying to call the cupboard a bedroom in that flat is really pushing it ! I doubt you could even get a single bed in there and still open the door.
2 -
Why are you posting flats that are nothing like the OP is looking for? Try looking for ones around £625K which is their budget? They aren't looking for a tiny cheap flat, they can afford something much better.
1 -
Only a two bedroomed flat. As the OP is looking for a 3 bedroomed house then it would be a bit cramped
Gather ye rosebuds while ye may1 -
This is the property I am referring to.
I very much doubt the tenants are going to be causing issues. This is an expensive area, they are certainly not going to be looking for council housing after this.
0 -
Delinja said:
https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/133780772#/?channel=RES_BUY
This is the property I am referring to.
I very much doubt the tenants are going to be causing issues. This is an expensive area, they are certainly not going to be looking for council housing after this.
You have to appreciate, that people generally come to this forum with issues. It is, despite being statistically uncommon, relatively common on this forum to see threads where first time buyers are over half a year into buying a house, several thousand pounds lighter on solicitors and searches, and foaming at the mouth because they've just learned that the section 21 the landlord served wasn't valid as the landlord can't prove they provided an up to date version of the 'How to Rent' guide, so the process starts from the beginning. The tenants are routinely briefed by the council and various homeless charities to only leave the property by formal eviction, which can take many, many months to appear before a judge, and then can be adjourned by last minute defenses. It is not unheard of for evictions to take over a year.
However, as I said above, this forum is a bit jaded in this regard, as the 99% who have trouble-free tenants aren't posting single sentence threads of "tenant left with no issues".
Also, I appreciate your comment of "I very much doubt the tenants are going to be causing issues. This is an expensive area, they are certainly not going to be looking for council housing after this.". I'd certainly agree it's probably very low risk but it depends on your appetite for risk. Even 1% is too much for some.
Know what you don't1 -
Exodi said:Delinja said:
https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/133780772#/?channel=RES_BUY
This is the property I am referring to.
I very much doubt the tenants are going to be causing issues. This is an expensive area, they are certainly not going to be looking for council housing after this.
You have to appreciate, that people generally come to this forum with issues. It is, despite being statistically uncommon, relatively common on this forum to see threads where first time buyers are over half a year into buying a house, several thousand pounds lighter on solicitors and searches, and foaming at the mouth because they've just learned that the section 21 the landlord served wasn't valid as the landlord can't prove they provided an up to date version of the 'How to Rent' guide, so the process starts from the beginning. The tenants are routinely briefed by the council and various homeless charities to only leave the property by formal eviction, which can take many, many months to appear before a judge, and then can be adjourned by last minute defenses. It is not unheard of for evictions to take over a year.
However, as I said above, this forum is a bit jaded in this regard, as the 99% who have trouble-free tenants aren't posting single sentence threads of "tenant left with no issues".
Also, I appreciate your comment of "I very much doubt the tenants are going to be causing issues. This is an expensive area, they are certainly not going to be looking for council housing after this.". I'd certainly agree it's probably very low risk but it depends on your appetite for risk. Even 1% is too much for some.
The main thing I have learned from this post is not to complete until tenants are fully out, which is totally valid and something I intend to do.
Worst case scenario is I lose some money on fees and delay my search, neither of which is insurmountable for me.
As for the actual price, well, it's clear nobody knows what the heck is gonna happen. Based on the the state of things today, it is a good value, and the bank will do a valuation anyway.3
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards