Success! - thanks to this forum

Le_Kirk

You are, of course, within your rights to ask for any personal data  that  they hold on you.  My point was that you've just put "financial statements" but not specified what it is you want.

B789

You may want to word/format your SAR using this template example:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/v29cyfyuglg1ban/subject_access_request3.pdf?dl=0

TreeofLife

Thank you for the suggestions.

My feeling is that if you ask for something specific, then they will restrict what they give you to that specific thing.  As I don't know how they hold my data, asking they for financial data should encompass every which way.

Also, I don't know for sure what has happened in respect of the landowner not wishing to pursue me and whether PE were notified about it at the time or only recently when I read on here to check with the landowner.  I am therefore trying to avoid presumptions and leaving the door open for PE to (hopefully) disclose what they received and when in respect of the  landowner/DCB etc.

It is for PE to have their systems set up to fairly easily access my data and send it to me.  Depending on what they send to me, I will ask for a SAR from the landowner to get clarification that they did notify PE on the 17/2/22 not to pursue me.  It then leaves the question, why did they?

TreeofLife

B789 said:

You may want to word/format your SAR using this template example:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/v29cyfyuglg1ban/subject_access_request3.pdf?dl=0

Thank you very much, I have downloaded this very useful template - what a star, you are Cheers

TreeofLife

fisherjim said:

TreeofLife said:

TreeofLife said:

fisherjim said:

Pretty certain it would not get to court, Parking Eye do not use debt collectors if they are sure of a win in court.

Direct Collection Bailiffs Ltd are not bailiffs (misrepresentation) they haven't purchased the 'debt', their client is PE and by their own words they go after money and despite their vile threatening letters, do not take legal action - they specialise in harassment.

I wrote to BCP about the use of the word 'Bailiffs' but BCP said that it was not in breach of it's Code.  As a notforprofit organisation, I'd have thought that the Charity Commission would have something to say about BCP's failure to curb sharp practices.

If you mean the BPA they are certainly not a charity they are simply a not for profit membership association so how would the Charity Commission be involved?

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/80217/not-for-profit-advice-services-england.pdf

Government info on the value of not-for-profit organisations, and oh financial assistance....

Goodness, what planet do they live on and why is it so difficult for MPs to effect change?

B789

TreeofLife said:

B789 said:

You may want to word/format your SAR using this template example:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/v29cyfyuglg1ban/subject_access_request3.pdf?dl=0

Thank you very much, I have downloaded this very useful template - what a star, you are Cheers

That template has all the information that the PPC needs in order to fulfil its legal obligation. They should not need to require any extra ID as you have provided your details and they can refer to the data they already hold to cross-reference. You will note in that request, that every bit of data they hold about you must include any other correspondence that mentions you, even if it was between the PPC and a third party.

fisherjim

TreeofLife said:

fisherjim said:

TreeofLife said:

TreeofLife said:

fisherjim said:

Pretty certain it would not get to court, Parking Eye do not use debt collectors if they are sure of a win in court.

Direct Collection Bailiffs Ltd are not bailiffs (misrepresentation) they haven't purchased the 'debt', their client is PE and by their own words they go after money and despite their vile threatening letters, do not take legal action - they specialise in harassment.

I wrote to BCP about the use of the word 'Bailiffs' but BCP said that it was not in breach of it's Code.  As a notforprofit organisation, I'd have thought that the Charity Commission would have something to say about BCP's failure to curb sharp practices.

If you mean the BPA they are certainly not a charity they are simply a not for profit membership association so how would the Charity Commission be involved?

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/80217/not-for-profit-advice-services-england.pdf

Government info on the value of not-for-profit organisations, and oh financial assistance....

Goodness, what planet do they live on and why is it so difficult for MPs to effect change?

Make no mistake the BPA like to outwardly give the impression that they are a fine upstanding organisation there to be impartial, supporting fair play for the whole community and they even boast about supporting charities.

Of course it's all just to present a front and the not for profit status is part of that, but lets take a look at it's former boss's track record to see just how fine and errr upstanding they actually are:

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/3133778/british-parking-association-quits-film-up-skirts-patrick-troy/

patient_dream

fisherjim said:

TreeofLife said:

fisherjim said:

TreeofLife said:

TreeofLife said:

fisherjim said:

Pretty certain it would not get to court, Parking Eye do not use debt collectors if they are sure of a win in court.

Direct Collection Bailiffs Ltd are not bailiffs (misrepresentation) they haven't purchased the 'debt', their client is PE and by their own words they go after money and despite their vile threatening letters, do not take legal action - they specialise in harassment.

I wrote to BCP about the use of the word 'Bailiffs' but BCP said that it was not in breach of it's Code.  As a notforprofit organisation, I'd have thought that the Charity Commission would have something to say about BCP's failure to curb sharp practices.

If you mean the BPA they are certainly not a charity they are simply a not for profit membership association so how would the Charity Commission be involved?

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/80217/not-for-profit-advice-services-england.pdf

Government info on the value of not-for-profit organisations, and oh financial assistance....

Goodness, what planet do they live on and why is it so difficult for MPs to effect change?

Make no mistake the BPA like to outwardly give the impression that they are a fine upstanding organisation there to be impartial, supporting fair play for the whole community and they even boast about supporting charities.

Of course it's all just to present a front and the not for profit status is part of that, but lets take a look at it's former boss's track record to see just how fine and errr upstanding they actually are:

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/3133778/british-parking-association-quits-film-up-skirts-patrick-troy/

Agreed ......  the BPA is a Jekyll and Hyde operation who are still trying to mug government, especially Mr Gove MP

When the consultation eventually comes through, I for one will be highlighting that the BPA is not fit for purpose. Government has blindly allowed the BPA TO SCAM people ... the fake add-on for a start ?

Rishi Sunak approved the new parking code of practice when he was
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government

Rishi has since said he wants fairness and transparency, a statement the british public is still waiting for ?

And when Rishi approved the new code in the House, this is what he said .... seems to us all, these were just empty words

https://www.parallelparliament.co.uk/mp/rishi-sunak/debate/2018-02-02/commons/commons-chamber/parking-code-of-practice-bill

TreeofLife

fisherjim said:

TreeofLife said:

fisherjim said:

TreeofLife said:

TreeofLife said:

fisherjim said:

Pretty certain it would not get to court, Parking Eye do not use debt collectors if they are sure of a win in court.

Direct Collection Bailiffs Ltd are not bailiffs (misrepresentation) they haven't purchased the 'debt', their client is PE and by their own words they go after money and despite their vile threatening letters, do not take legal action - they specialise in harassment.

I wrote to BCP about the use of the word 'Bailiffs' but BCP said that it was not in breach of it's Code.  As a notforprofit organisation, I'd have thought that the Charity Commission would have something to say about BCP's failure to curb sharp practices.

If you mean the BPA they are certainly not a charity they are simply a not for profit membership association so how would the Charity Commission be involved?

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/80217/not-for-profit-advice-services-england.pdf

Government info on the value of not-for-profit organisations, and oh financial assistance....

Goodness, what planet do they live on and why is it so difficult for MPs to effect change?

Make no mistake the BPA like to outwardly give the impression that they are a fine upstanding organisation there to be impartial, supporting fair play for the whole community and they even boast about supporting charities.

Of course it's all just to present a front and the not for profit status is part of that, but lets take a look at it's former boss's track record to see just how fine and errr upstanding they actually are:

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/3133778/british-parking-association-quits-film-up-skirts-patrick-troy/

Really?  It is this sort of debase conduct that women experience day-in-day out. Just great.

TreeofLife

patient_dream said:

fisherjim said:

TreeofLife said:

fisherjim said:

TreeofLife said:

TreeofLife said:

fisherjim said:

Pretty certain it would not get to court, Parking Eye do not use debt collectors if they are sure of a win in court.

Direct Collection Bailiffs Ltd are not bailiffs (misrepresentation) they haven't purchased the 'debt', their client is PE and by their own words they go after money and despite their vile threatening letters, do not take legal action - they specialise in harassment.

I wrote to BCP about the use of the word 'Bailiffs' but BCP said that it was not in breach of it's Code.  As a notforprofit organisation, I'd have thought that the Charity Commission would have something to say about BCP's failure to curb sharp practices.

If you mean the BPA they are certainly not a charity they are simply a not for profit membership association so how would the Charity Commission be involved?

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/80217/not-for-profit-advice-services-england.pdf

Government info on the value of not-for-profit organisations, and oh financial assistance....

Goodness, what planet do they live on and why is it so difficult for MPs to effect change?

Make no mistake the BPA like to outwardly give the impression that they are a fine upstanding organisation there to be impartial, supporting fair play for the whole community and they even boast about supporting charities.

Of course it's all just to present a front and the not for profit status is part of that, but lets take a look at it's former boss's track record to see just how fine and errr upstanding they actually are:

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/3133778/british-parking-association-quits-film-up-skirts-patrick-troy/

Agreed ......  the BPA is a Jekyll and Hyde operation who are still trying to mug government, especially Mr Gove MP

When the consultation eventually comes through, I for one will be highlighting that the BPA is not fit for purpose. Government has blindly allowed the BPA TO SCAM people ... the fake add-on for a start ?

Rishi Sunak approved the new parking code of practice when he was
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government

Rishi has since said he wants fairness and transparency, a statement the british public is still waiting for ?

And when Rishi approved the new code in the House, this is what he said .... seems to us all, these were just empty words

https://www.parallelparliament.co.uk/mp/rishi-sunak/debate/2018-02-02/commons/commons-chamber/parking-code-of-practice-bill

Holding politicians to account....