We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
FaceBook Warning Is This Real? Help
Comments
-
Username03725 said:I'd assume the ban was justified for repeatedly beginning sentences with So.
Seems fair to me.
There would have been a longer ban for saying are instead of our.
1 -
handful said:Username03725 said:I'd assume the ban was justified for repeatedly beginning sentences with So.
Seems fair to me.
There would have been a longer ban for saying are instead of our.
Do you mean "would of"?
1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
