We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

FaceBook Warning Is This Real? Help

2»

Comments

  • handful
    handful Posts: 568 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I'd assume the ban was justified for repeatedly beginning sentences with So. 

    Seems fair to me.

    There would have been a longer ban for saying are instead of our.
  • J_B
    J_B Posts: 6,878 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    handful said:
    I'd assume the ban was justified for repeatedly beginning sentences with So. 

    Seems fair to me.

    There would have been a longer ban for saying are instead of our.

    Do you mean "would of"? :D
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.