Parking eye- lease car

nem39esis

they didn't send me the attachments only the parking charge notice, first ive seen of the attachments i.e. hire agreement etc is in response to the POPLA appeal. 

Coupon-mad

Yes, I know that.  It's why I said 'purported' attachments and I had previously said that I know there was nothing enclosed.

But POPLA will think they were.

So, are they the right documents?

I am asking you specifically to look at the POFA and exactly which 2 documents it says 'must' accompany the NTH, and tell us whether these questionable documents meet the stated legal requirements.

B789

This is like trying to slide on sandpaper. 

nem39esis

sorry all been a busy week, yes i would say they complied

Coupon-mad

OK but you and I both know those documents were never enclosed with the NTH, so that is what you say in your comments to POPLA.

nem39esis

Yep I’ve put that in as my comments, 

I’ve also stated the below points but worded it differently of course. 

no planning for signage and camera 

vehicle did not park in any spaces and no evidence provided that it did

signage is facing inwards, non illuminated and car park is not illuminated. 

One of the signs in the car park signage map they enclosed is not there

no contract provided or details of landowner etc

dont believe they complied with timescales in notices to keeper 

Coupon-mad

All good, but drop this entirely:

"no planning for signage and camera."