We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Impact on benefits from house sale

Good afternoon 

Looking for advice on the below:

Married couple purchase house as joint tenants. They have 2 children.

They amicably divorce. 

Mother claims universal credit with low income from Jon and child benefit.

Husband pays mortgage but moves out.

Now they wish to sell property. There will be equity from the sale.

Is there a way for the mother to maintain her universal credit income without breaking any laws?

Neither want to fall foul of the law but also don't want to see money made from the house sale whittled away. 


Comments

  • marcia_
    marcia_ Posts: 4,124 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 20 February 2023 at 6:19PM
    Cs9ja17 said:
    Good afternoon 

    Looking for advice on the below:

    Married couple purchase house as joint tenants. They have 2 children.

    They amicably divorce. 

    Mother claims universal credit with low income from Jon and child benefit.

    Husband pays mortgage but moves out.

    Now they wish to sell property. There will be equity from the sale.

    Is there a way for the mother to maintain her universal credit income without breaking any laws?

    Neither want to fall foul of the law but also don't want to see money made from the house sale whittled away. 


     Is she planning on buying a new home? 

    2026 wins - Parker Pen, American Sweets bundle, dish magic bundle

  • Cs9ja17
    Cs9ja17 Posts: 24 Forumite
    10 Posts First Anniversary
    marcia_ said:
    Cs9ja17 said:
    Good afternoon 

    Looking for advice on the below:

    Married couple purchase house as joint tenants. They have 2 children.

    They amicably divorce. 

    Mother claims universal credit with low income from Jon and child benefit.

    Husband pays mortgage but moves out.

    Now they wish to sell property. There will be equity from the sale.

    Is there a way for the mother to maintain her universal credit income without breaking any laws?

    Neither want to fall foul of the law but also don't want to see money made from the house sale whittled away. 


     Is she planning on buying a new home? 
    Unsure. She will move with new partner into a home owned by new partners Father which is in process of transferring ownership to new partner. She may wish to purchase a share of this property. 
  • TELLIT01
    TELLIT01 Posts: 18,614 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper PPI Party Pooper
    Sale proceeds from the current property can be ignored for up to 6 months if looking to purchase another property.
  • peteuk
    peteuk Posts: 2,198 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Cs9ja17 said:
    marcia_ said
     Is she planning on buying a new home? 
    Unsure. She will move with new partner into a home owned by new partners Father which is in process of transferring ownership to new partner. She may wish to purchase a share of this property. 
    Any profit from the house is likely to be split 50/50, deductions for UC start when savings are over £6K and eligibility for UC stops at savings over £16K.  As noted house sale will be disregarded for 6 months. 

    However, this all might be a mute point as if she moves in with new partner, it becomes a joint claim and as such should report the change in circumstances.
    Proud to have dealt with our debts
    Starting debt 2005 £65.7K.
    Current debt ZERO.
    DEBT FREE
  • poppy12345
    poppy12345 Posts: 18,976 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Cs9ja17 said:
    marcia_ said:
    Cs9ja17 said:
    Good afternoon 

    Looking for advice on the below:

    Married couple purchase house as joint tenants. They have 2 children.

    They amicably divorce. 

    Mother claims universal credit with low income from Jon and child benefit.

    Husband pays mortgage but moves out.

    Now they wish to sell property. There will be equity from the sale.

    Is there a way for the mother to maintain her universal credit income without breaking any laws?

    Neither want to fall foul of the law but also don't want to see money made from the house sale whittled away. 


     Is she planning on buying a new home? 
    She may wish to purchase a share of this property. 
    If the house she owns a 50/50 share of sells then it won't be disregarded because she "may" purchase a share of another property.
  • NedS
    NedS Posts: 5,301 Ambassador
    Sixth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Cs9ja17 said:
    marcia_ said:
    Cs9ja17 said:
    Good afternoon 

    Looking for advice on the below:

    Married couple purchase house as joint tenants. They have 2 children.

    They amicably divorce. 

    Mother claims universal credit with low income from Jon and child benefit.

    Husband pays mortgage but moves out.

    Now they wish to sell property. There will be equity from the sale.

    Is there a way for the mother to maintain her universal credit income without breaking any laws?

    Neither want to fall foul of the law but also don't want to see money made from the house sale whittled away. 


     Is she planning on buying a new home? 
    She may wish to purchase a share of this property. 
    If the house she owns a 50/50 share of sells then it won't be disregarded because she "may" purchase a share of another property.
    Agreed. Often they find themselves in a position where buying another property is unrealistic as the capital realised from the sale is insufficient to purchase another property and it may be unrealistic to obtain a mortgage whilst on benefits, so there would be no grounds to disregard the capital and it would be taken into account in full, ceasing any entitlement to UC.
    To be disregarded they must be able to show proof of the intent to purchase another property - e.g, having a mortgage approved in principle or having an offer accepted on a property etc. Having an aspiration to purchase another property is not sufficient grounds to disregard.

    I am a Forum Ambassador and I support the Forum Team on the Benefits & tax credits, Heat pumps and Green & Ethical MoneySaving forums. If you need any help on those boards, do let me know. Please note that Ambassadors are not moderators. Any post you spot in breach of the Forum Rules should be reported via the report button, or by emailing forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com. All views are my own & not the official line of Money Saving Expert.
    Our green credentials: 12kW Samsung ASHP for heating, 7.2kWp Solar (South facing), Tesla Powerwall 3 (13.5kWh), Net exporter

  • Voyager2002
    Voyager2002 Posts: 16,349 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Cs9ja17 said:
    marcia_ said:
    Cs9ja17 said:
    Good afternoon 

    Looking for advice on the below:

    Married couple purchase house as joint tenants. They have 2 children.

    They amicably divorce. 

    Mother claims universal credit with low income from Jon and child benefit.

    Husband pays mortgage but moves out.

    Now they wish to sell property. There will be equity from the sale.

    Is there a way for the mother to maintain her universal credit income without breaking any laws?

    Neither want to fall foul of the law but also don't want to see money made from the house sale whittled away. 


     Is she planning on buying a new home? 
    Unsure. She will move with new partner into a home owned by new partners Father which is in process of transferring ownership to new partner. She may wish to purchase a share of this property. 
    When she moves in with new partner her situation will be different. The DWP will look at the total income and needs of the new household and will presume that the new partner will support her financially. If he has a decent income then probably all means-tested components of UC will stop.
  • born_again
    born_again Posts: 23,788 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Sixth Anniversary Name Dropper
    A thought here.
    Say OP is still able to claim UC with new partner. (new can of worms, with transfer of ownership)

    Just what would be considered as "purchase a share of this property".

    Would simply handing the other party the funds be considered OK, or a D of C. Or would they want to see a new joint mortgage?
    Life in the slow lane
  • peteuk
    peteuk Posts: 2,198 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    A thought here.
    Say OP is still able to claim UC with new partner. (new can of worms, with transfer of ownership)

    Just what would be considered as "purchase a share of this property".

    Would simply handing the other party the funds be considered OK, or a D of C. Or would they want to see a new joint mortgage?
    To add someone onto a mortgage is a relatively easy task, if she then uses the profit from the sale of the original property then this will obviously bring down the total owed.  It would be up to the lender and them to work out what is best, re-mortgage or additional payment (I would suggest the later depending on the terms of the mortgage and interest rate) 

    However as I and others have noted, moving in/adding to the current mortgage will mean a joint UC claim.  If she hands the money to the new partner and he keeps it then IOM it will go against them as savings. 
    Proud to have dealt with our debts
    Starting debt 2005 £65.7K.
    Current debt ZERO.
    DEBT FREE
  • Muttleythefrog
    Muttleythefrog Posts: 20,662 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 21 February 2023 at 7:09PM
    NedS said:
    Cs9ja17 said:
    marcia_ said:
    Cs9ja17 said:
    Good afternoon 

    Looking for advice on the below:

    Married couple purchase house as joint tenants. They have 2 children.

    They amicably divorce. 

    Mother claims universal credit with low income from Jon and child benefit.

    Husband pays mortgage but moves out.

    Now they wish to sell property. There will be equity from the sale.

    Is there a way for the mother to maintain her universal credit income without breaking any laws?

    Neither want to fall foul of the law but also don't want to see money made from the house sale whittled away. 


     Is she planning on buying a new home? 
    She may wish to purchase a share of this property. 
    If the house she owns a 50/50 share of sells then it won't be disregarded because she "may" purchase a share of another property.
    Agreed. Often they find themselves in a position where buying another property is unrealistic as the capital realised from the sale is insufficient to purchase another property and it may be unrealistic to obtain a mortgage whilst on benefits, so there would be no grounds to disregard the capital and it would be taken into account in full, ceasing any entitlement to UC.
    To be disregarded they must be able to show proof of the intent to purchase another property - e.g, having a mortgage approved in principle or having an offer accepted on a property etc. Having an aspiration to purchase another property is not sufficient grounds to disregard.

    Just regarding your second paragraph.... I don't know what is standard in terms of evidence required or whether Covid Pandemic affected what staff resources were placed into and its relevance to whether procedural requirements were short-cutted.... but I was never asked for any evidence at any point when  gaining sale proceeds, intending to buy another property with such proceeds, successfully asking for extension to the 6 months disregard as initial one expired, spending of those proceeds... all I did provide was my own declarations of events which they seemed to accept. But obviously it would be prudent regardless to ensure evidence of intent exists and if a mortgage was required then inevitably there should be that evidence of being in place in principle.
    "Do not attribute to conspiracy what can adequately be explained by incompetence" - rogerblack
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.