IMPORTANT REMINDER: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information. If you are uploading images, please take extra care that you have redacted all personal information.

PCN received for parking in parent/child bay with children!

Hi all and hope everyone is well.

I was wondering if anybody could help with the following query as this is all new to me.

Yesterday, I received a 'notice to keeper' letter from Ocean Parking complete with parking charge of £100. This is the first such correspondence that I had received regarding anything along these lines although it claims to have written to me previously (nothing received in the post) offering a reduced amount if settled within 14 days. Again, this 'second' letter is the first correspondence I have had.

The PCN relates to the driver parking in a free shopping centre car park on a weekday morning at the start of January in a Parent/Child bay. This is quite ridiculous because at this stated time, two children (10 months & 4 years of age) were in the car and will have left the car with the driver and returned back to the car with the driver. Therefore, I am not quite sure where this 'evidence' suggests otherwise, although none is attached to the letter to be seen.

The PCN issued date was 3rd Jan at 09.32 and this letter, received yesterday, is dated 2nd February 2023 if that helps.

Happy to provide any further details if required but I assume I appeal this in writing/email?
«13

Replies

  • edited 5 February at 10:15AM
    FruitcakeFruitcake Forumite
    56.1K Posts
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Forumite
    edited 5 February at 10:15AM
    Does the NTK suggest a NTD might have been left on the windscreen at the time of the alleged event? The dates make me think this is a case of ghost ticketing where a NTD was put on the windscreen, photographed, then removed by some person or persons unknown.

    Plan A is always for the vehicle keeper to complain to the landowner and their MP.

    If that fails then the keeper should appeal using the template in blue text they will find in the sticky Announcement for NEWBIES using whatever appeal method is stated on the NTK, which is usually an appeal portal. The appeal should be sent unaltered from the keeper with no mention of who parked in the gimmick bay.
    I married my cousin. I had to...
    I don't have a sister. :D
    All my screwdrivers are cordless.
    "You're Safety Is My Primary Concern Dear" - Laks
  • edited 6 February at 10:52AM
    fluffy123fluffy123 Forumite
    361 Posts
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    Forumite
    edited 6 February at 10:52AM
    Thanks for the help. I've attached links to the letter and signage. Nothing I can spot although nothing was left on the windscreen upon returning to the car on the day.

    Car had one car seat easily visible through the driver side passenger window and the other car seat was removed to attach to the pram base to visit the shopping centre and was put back into the car upon return shortly after. 

    https://ibb.co/HFrpJ9d

    https://ibb.co/wM7D4SX

    https://ibb.co/h9B7RmV


  • edited 6 February at 3:16PM
    The_Slithy_ToveThe_Slithy_Tove Forumite
    4K Posts
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    Forumite
    edited 6 February at 3:16PM
    As fruitcake says, #1 is to complain to the landowner.

    Not sure if we've seen a Parent & Child space case ever being take to court, as it would be extremely hard to prove. Think about it. The parking company has to prove a negative - that there were no children in the car - always hard. And it would mean them having to drag the minimum-wage parking attendant to the court of your choice to act as witness, who would need to swear about an incident that would be many, many months in the past, and probably without any contemporaneous notes or other evidence. That's not going to happen.

    And it would have parallels with the infamous "VCS vs Ibbotson" case (this one for "leaving the site"), where VCS got into deep doo-doo with the judge.
  • fisherjimfisherjim Forumite
    5.3K Posts
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Forumite
    Lets face it if there were 10 cars parked in parent and child bays it's well worth trying it on with all of them, chances are at least one will cave in at the first hurdle kerching not much to loose is there another add on scam!
  • fisherjimfisherjim Forumite
    5.3K Posts
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Forumite
    That signage just says that parent and child spaces are available, so what there are no further descriptions, explanations or restrictions attached to that it means absolutely nothing.
  • Half_wayHalf_way Forumite
    6.7K Posts
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Forumite
    Where is this "shopping centre"

    Depending upon what you want to do, you could have some fun with this, and fight back,
    Either which way if you did have children in the vehicle and they issued a parking charge notice as you have said, then you should attack it as a breach of GDPR , as they had no just cause to access and process your personal data
    From the Plain Language Commission:

    "The BPA has surely become one of the most socially dangerous organisations in the UK"
  • B789B789 Forumite
    967 Posts
    500 Posts Fourth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    Forumite
    It's this place: https://goo.gl/maps/H4RUy667vVrzciL1A

    As you can see, the iconography on the parking places bears no resemblance to the iconography on the sign.

    Aside from the idiotic proof the PPC has to provide to back up their lying enforcers, this has no chance of ever going to court... unless the PPC is managed by supreme morons who just love getting spanked in court.
    Good grammar adds tone and nuance to the "written" word which is normally perceived in the "spoken" word. Without good grammar, you can be perceived to be an idiot or a fool without ever uttering a sound.
  • patient_dreampatient_dream Forumite
    2.5K Posts
    1,000 Posts First Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    Forumite
    B789 said:


    Aside from the idiotic proof the PPC has to provide to back up their lying enforcers, this has no chance of ever going to court... unless the PPC is managed by supreme morons who just love getting spanked in court.
    So right ,,,,,,, my words as well. 

    We of course must remember that Ocean Parking is a BPA cowboy and the BPA must be very pleased they have another member who is hell bent on telling government they are not fir for purpose
Sign In or Register to comment.
Latest MSE News and Guides

Did you know there's an MSE app?

It's free & available on iOS & Android

MSE App

Regifting: good idea or not?

Add your two cents to the discussion

MSE Forum

Energy Price Guarantee calculator

How much you'll likely pay from April

MSE Tools