Letter of Claim from DCB Legal - PCN dated 2019

Coupon-mad

Actually, they can, in the strict sense of case law about contracts.  Search the forum for words like: Buckingham Palace parking contract

But they can't in practice.  Because the DVLA KADOE contract requires landowner authority.

I repeat: UKPC don't OWN car parks.

anotheronewasted

Coupon-mad said:

Actually, they can, in the strict sense of case law about contracts.  Search the forum for words like: Buckingham Palace parking contract

But they can't in practice.  Because the DVLA KADOE contract requires landowner authority.

I repeat: UKPC don't OWN car parks.

I know UKPC didn't own car parks.
But they run them on an operational level. As a business

So far BCC have been unable to answer my FOI request.
So for me, it is not clear if they had the right to operate at this car park. 
I realise it's 99% likely to be a dead end, but now I've started with the council, im intrigued as to what they will find. 
And to verify whether the land owner at the time knew of their practices.  

Coupon-mad

UKPC will have landowner/landholder authority.  Undoubtedly.  Nothing to do with the Council.

If it's a retail park, that contract will likely have been with the property managing agents named on the store names 'welcome plinth' if there is one at the entrance.  Or found online when you Google and read retail units for lease adverts at that place.

None of it affects your case because the court claim will be discontinued and the whole scam will be over (with no hearing) later this year.

patient_dream

I like what Taiko above has said.

It is the only way to treat idiots.  
I seem to remember that Steve Clark ex BPA now works for DCBL ?
This alone must raise doubts about the credibility of the BPA

NOW, the lady who signs a statement of truth for DCBL is Yaemin Mia
https://dcblegal.co.uk/uncategorised/meet-the-team-yasmin-mia/

She constantly claims that fake charges ... ARE TRUE when they are not  ... ESPECIALLY THE CLAIM FOR DAMAGES

Here is what government say about fakery in court ...
“If you dishonestly enter information or make a statement that you know is, or might be, untrue or misleading, and intend by doing so to make a gain for yourself or another person, or to cause loss or the risk of loss to another person, you may commit the offence of fraud under section 1 of the Fraud Act 2006, the maximum penalty for which is 10 years imprisonment or an unlimited fine, or both.”

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/statements-of-truth/practice-guide-73-statements-of-truth

This is the penalty for claims that are not true
Is this what YASMIN MIA wants ... we must apply the law, it will happen

B789

Just as a matter of interest, how does one get any judge's juices flowing enough to get Yasmin Mia in front of them to answer the allegation about her untruthful statements of truth?

We see this all the time and we harp on about it but no one seems to have raided this directly in their defences or WS.

Le_Kirk

Considering the number of Witness Statements signed by Yasmin Mia, she must spend a lot of time in loads of car parks around the country.  Can they strictly be called "Witness Statements"?

Taiko

Le_Kirk said:

Considering the number of Witness Statements signed by Yasmin Mia, she must spend a lot of time in loads of car parks around the country.  Can they strictly be called "Witness Statements"?

I think there's a term for individuals who loiter multiple car parks looking for punters.. 

anotheronewasted

B789 said:

Just as a matter of interest, how does one get any judge's juices flowing enough to get Yasmin Mia in front of them to answer the allegation about her untruthful statements of truth?

We see this all the time and we harp on about it but no one seems to have raided this directly in their defences or WS.

I'd be more than happy to raise this in my defense / WS, if the general consensus is it will be helpful. 

Coupon-mad

No, there is no chance of that hitting home, and in fact you have to be very careful in a small claim not to throw accusations of dishonesty about.  You can end up with punitive costs against you.

anotheronewasted

Coupon-mad said:

No, there is no chance of that hitting home, and in fact you have to be very careful in a small claim not to throw accusations of dishonesty about.  You can end up with punitive costs against you.

Yeah, that's a very good point tbf