PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.

Alienation and Pre-emption rights in the lease???

Hi there are below clauses in our lease (we are currently in the process of buying a converted flat in a victorian house, we will also own a share of the freehold with three other flats in a form of a management company). We asked our solicitor about it but the solicitor refuses to give a direct answer whether this is a standard term or unusal or if there are any specific legal risks (it’s been difficult to get anything yes or no from them..but always a lawyerly response that sounds strangely neutral…)

“Sell or sublet the property, in accordance with the terms outlined in the lease. (Alienation)

Agree to sell your property to another individual or company, without first offering the landlord or freeholder the chance to purchase your leasehold property. (Right of Pre-emption)”

Are these standard terms under a lease? I cannot understand why I would need to offer the freeholders the right to buy the property? Is this an acceptable risk to take since I will also have a share of freehold?

Thank you for any insights!

Comments

  • propertyrental
    propertyrental Posts: 3,391 Forumite
    1,000 Posts First Anniversary Name Dropper
    edited 26 January 2023 at 10:54PM
    Unusual, though it would help if you quoted the clause(s) in full +confirm it is the lease itself.
    "in accordance with the terms outlined in the lease." suggests this is not the lease.
  • user1977
    user1977 Posts: 17,292 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Seventh Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 26 January 2023 at 10:59PM
    JK4158 said:

    “Sell or sublet the property, in accordance with the terms outlined in the lease. (Alienation)

    ​Agree to sell your property to another individual or company, without first offering the landlord or freeholder the chance to purchase your leasehold property. (Right of Pre-emption)”

    Is it actually the Lease you're quoting from? Those look like snippets from something else. Definitions of typical lease terms or a report of some sort.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 349.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453K Spending & Discounts
  • 242.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 619.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.4K Life & Family
  • 255.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.