We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
ASHP with heat battery
Comments
-
Wow, that is a bit of a beast! Electrically and physically. I look forward to seeing how it develops and what a smaller version looks like.Solarchaser said:
There should be a theoretical zero conversion loss, or 100% conversion rate for the tanks, as the heat is applied directly to the water through the immersed heaters.Reed_Richards said:
I think you are missing the point. If you heat your thermal store to 60 C then volume-for-volume a Sunamp will store a good deal more heat than a tank of water. If you heat your thermal store to 85 C then volume-for-volume the percentage difference in storage capacity between a Sunamp and a tank of water is reduced.waqasahmed said:Thanks. I guess that's why you might wanna go for a sunamp instead (or several sunamps) because of the ability to work with lower flow temps?
@Solarchaser , what's the "conversion loss" for your tanks of water?
In reality there will be a bit lost in the wiring and connections to the heaters, but that said, id imagine less than 1%.
So if it was purely conversion, water tanks win hands down, however when it comes to storage after conversion, the sunamp wins hands down as it stores it in a much smaller physical volume and we (I) think it should be inert at those stored temperatures, vs the tanks constantly losing heat.
So if you were heating to use straight away (short time frame) then water tanks are clear winner's, but if you are storing for longer time (weeks??) The sunamp would be a clear winner, where the lines converge I've no idea.
I guess when the tanks lose 15% of their stored heat, which for me would be probably about 8C, and that would likely be just over 24 hours in their current configuration
That's still falling back to that one instance in a video that I caught the 85% conversion, that I've found no proof of.
Using a sunamp just for heat might work, as it would give a constant supply of a set heat for a defined amount of time.
Potentially stored for long periods of time.
I've edited my comment above, I am quite certain that 85% was mentioned for Caldera, but I can't find anything saying that now.
Their brochure says 98-99% conversion and stsnding losses of just under 5kwh/day
From the website "We are currently not making Warmstone for homes while we develop an industrial product."4.3kW PV, 3.6kW inverter. Octopus Agile import, gas Tracker. Zoe. Ripple x 3. Cheshire1
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards