📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

hmmmmmm room temperature

Options
2»

Comments

  • It’s worth underlining also that ASHPs are going to be more efficient at increasing the internal temperature than GCH or former standard forms of electric heating where you’d presumably need 5kW input to get that same 1° increase? 

    More efficient is correct, but not necessarily cheaper compared to gas central heating. At the moment electricity (~34p/kWh) is just over 3x more expensive than gas (~10.3p/kWh). A heat pump would need to produce about 3.3 kWh of heat output per kWh of electricity input to break even compared to gas, assuming the same efficiency of the rest of the system.

    Obviously, a heat pump easily beats direct electric heating on efficiency, and both gas and heat pumps beat direct electric heating on price.
  • Astria
    Astria Posts: 1,448 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper
    It’s worth underlining also that ASHPs are going to be more efficient at increasing the internal temperature than GCH or former standard forms of electric heating where you’d presumably need 5kW input to get that same 1° increase? 

    More efficient is correct, but not necessarily cheaper compared to gas central heating. At the moment electricity (~34p/kWh) is just over 3x more expensive than gas (~10.3p/kWh). A heat pump would need to produce about 3.3 kWh of heat output per kWh of electricity input to break even compared to gas, assuming the same efficiency of the rest of the system.
    Air-to-water heat pumps are pretty good at maintaining temperature (assuming they are installed and configured correctly), but typically quite poor at increasing the temperature due to there low flow temperatures. The higher the flow rate the lower they typically perform.
    Air-to-air heat pumps can seem more efficient because they can produce an instant result in the sense of warm air being blown around, rather than convected air warming the room, but if people are not in their air flow they can seem less efficient. 
    I have a A2A heat pump downstairs which only draws about 500W, which is perfect for spring and autumn as it can run off solar power, but its not very good in the depths of winter.
  • jvjack said:
    The 900k houses may be being heated to 23 degrees in every room night and day so it might be enough to warm up the roofs more than if at 18 degrees.
    The direction of the roof plays a big role as well. My row of terraces, none of the houses keep their frost on the roof once the sun is up. There’s another terrace of identical houses at right angles that have frost visible a lot of the day. 
  • jvjack
    jvjack Posts: 361 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 23 January 2023 at 8:17PM
    Same where i live alibean121.  I watched and let the sun come round the house this saturday morning to clear the frost on my van windscreen before going to supermarket. Took about 20 mins.
    Could be the heat loss though. Or those tiles or the sun. Or they use the loft/attick as rooms.


  • Mstty
    Mstty Posts: 4,209 Forumite
    1,000 Posts First Anniversary Photogenic Name Dropper
    It’s worth underlining also that ASHPs are going to be more efficient at increasing the internal temperature than GCH or former standard forms of electric heating where you’d presumably need 5kW input to get that same 1° increase? 

    More efficient is correct, but not necessarily cheaper compared to gas central heating. At the moment electricity (~34p/kWh) is just over 3x more expensive than gas (~10.3p/kWh). A heat pump would need to produce about 3.3 kWh of heat output per kWh of electricity input to break even compared to gas, assuming the same efficiency of the rest of the system.

    Obviously, a heat pump easily beats direct electric heating on efficiency, and both gas and heat pumps beat direct electric heating on price.
    You forgot to calculate that boilers are not 100% efficient.

    If you adjust for an average 90% efficiency which is very generous the cop required is 3kwh output to match.

    As an example our 7 and a half year old ASHP won't have lost any efficiency and still producing a yearly SCOP of over 3. Not sure this would be the same for a gas boiler.

    Just some food for thought but I am certainly glad we didn't have to pay to have this out in and bought the house as second owners. That's the main difference there is no return on investment it's still very much a "green" choice for those that can afford it.
  • well we are leaving heating on 24/7 and setting the thermostat at 20 daytime and 15 night time, the cost seems to be acceptable, lets hope 2023 is a hot year...
    Now we all know how it felt to play in the band on the Titanic...
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.