We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Understanding Boiler Efficiency
Options

paperclap
Posts: 779 Forumite

Hi all,
We have an old non-condensing conventional Potterton Profile 40e boiler. 12 kWh output. It's probably 70% efficient.
This means it uses 12kWh of gas per hour to run. However, being 70% efficient, it wastes 30% of the energy. Correct? Therefore, it takes longer for the boiler to heat the water to the required temperature, to flow around the pipework of the house, and heat the home to the desired temperature. Right?
Hypothetically speaking, let's say we were to replace our boiler with a new, 12kWh output boiler, which was say 95% efficient. It wastes 5% of its energy. It will still use 12kWh of gas per hour to run. But, it will heat the water to the required temperature faster (25% faster), and in turn heat the house (25%) faster.
Is my thinking correct?
And yes, we could go into a bucketload of variables. Current internal temperature, external temperature, humidity, insulation, draft proofing, etc. But, let's not.
Perhaps I'm oversimplifying this, or perhaps I'm not.
Thanks in advance.
We have an old non-condensing conventional Potterton Profile 40e boiler. 12 kWh output. It's probably 70% efficient.
This means it uses 12kWh of gas per hour to run. However, being 70% efficient, it wastes 30% of the energy. Correct? Therefore, it takes longer for the boiler to heat the water to the required temperature, to flow around the pipework of the house, and heat the home to the desired temperature. Right?
Hypothetically speaking, let's say we were to replace our boiler with a new, 12kWh output boiler, which was say 95% efficient. It wastes 5% of its energy. It will still use 12kWh of gas per hour to run. But, it will heat the water to the required temperature faster (25% faster), and in turn heat the house (25%) faster.
Is my thinking correct?
And yes, we could go into a bucketload of variables. Current internal temperature, external temperature, humidity, insulation, draft proofing, etc. But, let's not.
Perhaps I'm oversimplifying this, or perhaps I'm not.
Thanks in advance.
0
Comments
-
paperclap said: Hypothetically speaking, let's say we were to replace our boiler with a new, 12kWh output boiler, which was say 95% efficient. It wastes 5% of its energy. It will still use 12kWh of gas per hour to run. But, it will heat the water to the required temperature faster (25% faster), and in turn heat the house (25%) faster.The speed at which your house heats up is limited by the size of the radiators and the temperature of the water. All things remaining equal, switching to a new condensing boiler won't get the house up to temperature any faster.Replacing the boiler with a modern one comes with other potentials for saving energy - Assuming you only need 8KW to heat the house, the boiler will modulate down and use less gas. With a smart(er) thermostat, as the house approaches the set temperature, the boiler can be commanded to modulate down even further so that you don't get a massive overshoot.
Her courage will change the world.
Treasure the moments that you have. Savour them for as long as you can for they will never come back again.0 -
Pretty much, but it's 25% less efficient which makes the new boiler ~35% more efficient.Everything that is supposed to be in heaven is already here on earth.
0 -
Doozergirl said:Pretty much, but it's 25% less efficient which makes the new boiler ~35% more efficient.
Her courage will change the world.
Treasure the moments that you have. Savour them for as long as you can for they will never come back again.1 -
Add in weather compensation to reduce the flow temperature so that you extract the maximum amount of enegy from the condensation process, and you should save more than the raw efficiency figures suggest.The comments I post are my personal opinion. While I try to check everything is correct before posting, I can and do make mistakes, so always try to check official information sources before relying on my posts.0
-
Ultimately, the efficiency is about how much of the heat from the gas flames ends up heating the water, and how much disappears out of the flue.If you put a pan of cold water on a has hob, light the hob, and hold your hand above the saucepan, you'll realise that a lot of the heat misses the pan entirely. The same happens with gas boilers.Modern condensing gas boilers improve this by having two heat exchangers. One directly over the flames, as normal, and a second one in the flue. The incoming water goes through that second heat exchanger, which uses heat from the flue gases to pre-warm the water. Then the already warmed water goes throgh the main heat exchanger.If it sticks, force it.
If it breaks, well it wasn't working right anyway.1 -
It may have been 70% efficient at install, so probably rather lower now.
Since it's now at least 18 years old, the question of efficiency may not be the main factor in deciding whether to replace it; rather more the question of how much longer it will be reliable, and how much longer you can still get spares for it.No free lunch, and no free laptop0 -
paperclap said:This means it uses 12kWh of gas per hour to run. However, being 70% efficient, it wastes 30% of the energy. Correct? Therefore, it takes longer for the boiler to heat the water to the required temperature, to flow around the pipework of the house, and heat the home to the desired temperature. Right?
The heat input when new depended on the gas pressure/flow rate set during installation:
Minimum was 11.63 kW in (output 8.79 kW into the circulating water).
Medium was 13.29 kW input (10.26 kW out)
and Max in was 14.93 kW (11.72 kW out).
So it more depends on what settings yours is at and what the house needs.
Those cast iron heat exchangers were fairly bulletproof, I believe. But DO keep a CO monitor in that room: the fan flued system is positive ventilation and a combustion chamber / case seal leak will push combustion gases into the room.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.4K Spending & Discounts
- 243.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 256.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards